2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08169-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and survival of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, peritoneal, and undesignated abdominal/pelvic cancers in Sweden 1960–2014: A population-based cohort study

Abstract: Background Despite improved surgical and oncological treatment, ovarian cancer continues to be the most lethal of the gynecologic malignancies. We aimed to analyze survival trends in epithelial ovarian cancer with regard to age, tumor site, and morphology in Sweden 1960 to 2014. Methods A nationwide population-based study was conducted using data from the Swedish Cancer Registry on 46,350 women aged 18 or older with a diagnosis of epithelial ovaria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This kind of uneven improvement for survival offers an excellent justification for conditional survival analysis. Similar conclusions of no long-term survival improvement were reached by analysing 10-year survival in the Netherlands, and later in Sweden [ 7 , 20 ]. Another way of estimating periodic differences in survival is to simply compare the differences between 1- and 5-year survival at different times.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This kind of uneven improvement for survival offers an excellent justification for conditional survival analysis. Similar conclusions of no long-term survival improvement were reached by analysing 10-year survival in the Netherlands, and later in Sweden [ 7 , 20 ]. Another way of estimating periodic differences in survival is to simply compare the differences between 1- and 5-year survival at different times.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Age differences in ovarian cancer survival have been reported in earlier studies, including the recent DK and SE studies [20,24]. The DK study discussed the evidence and the theories for the age disparity, considering limited offered treatment, toleration of treatment, late stage disease at presentation, tumor biological differences and comorbidities [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The 5-year survival rate of ovarian cancer has remained in the range of 40-50% in the past 20 years despite diagnostic and therapeutic advancements [2,3]. When diagnosed early, the prognosis of ovarian cancer is much better, with a 5-year survival rate of 73-92% for tumors diagnosed at stage I, compared to < 6% for tumors diagnosed at stage IV [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is used to reduce the number of tumour cells and is typically followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), including carboplatin and paclitaxel [12][13][14][15][16]. But OVCA patients often still meet with an unfavourable prognosis due to late diagnosis [17][18][19][20][21]. Further study of the mechanism of OVCA will be helpful to find effective measures for early diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%