2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and significance of nonaneurysmal-related computed tomography scan findings in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Abstract: CT scans yielded surprisingly large numbers of both primary and secondary incidental findings, many of which were clinically significant. Primary incidental findings were more common than secondary incidental findings; however, clinically significant findings were found at a consistent rate throughout the study period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two previous studies demonstrate the benefit of CT scanning for finding and treating early, incidental lesions. 12,13 Early diagnosis was attained for most of the patients who developed a malignancy in this population, and all of these patients are still alive. In particular, the patient who was found to have small cell cancer and has survived 6 years after treatment for that disease is notable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two previous studies demonstrate the benefit of CT scanning for finding and treating early, incidental lesions. 12,13 Early diagnosis was attained for most of the patients who developed a malignancy in this population, and all of these patients are still alive. In particular, the patient who was found to have small cell cancer and has survived 6 years after treatment for that disease is notable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data available about the frequency of incidental findings in the abdomen derive from CT examinations performed in a search for renal calculi with low-dose CT, CT colonography for cancer screening, emergency CT in trauma patients, and CTA of the abdominal aorta and the lower extremities (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). Messersmith et al, evaluating 321 consecutive patients from the emergency department with non-contrast renal stone abdominal scans, found a 45% prevalence of incidental findings (half were rated of ''moderate or serious'' concern), however, they did not report on any malignancies (17 (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, incidental findings may lead to higher costs in healthcare and increased concern in patients because of additional examinations or treatment that may have to be performed to exclude or treat a diagnosis. [2][3][4] Literature is available on the workup for incidental findings on MDCTs of the thorax 5,6 and the abdomen, 7 on specific incidental findings, such as of the thyroid, 8 and on specific patient populations such as urological 9 and abdominal aneurysm 10 patients. In addition, several studies have evaluated the frequency of incidental findings in trauma populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%