2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020-00164-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and risk factors of postdural puncture headache: prospective cohort study design

Abstract: Background Postdural puncture headache is one of the complications following spinal anesthesia and accidental dural puncture. Several modifiable risk factors contribute to the development of headache after lumbar puncture, which includes needle size, needle design, direction of the bevel, and number of lumbar puncture attempts. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk of postdural puncture headache. Methods This prospective … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing this group with the retrospective cohort (Group 2) evinced reduced time to outcome (treatment duration), making patients ready to discharge. Other fi ndings like the occurrence of PDPH commonly in the younger population (median age in years of Group 1 is 32.5, and Group 2 is 35) and its association with large-bore needles (78% with 25 G Quincke-type and 22% with 27 G Whitacre-type) are consistent with available literature of PDPH [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Comparing this group with the retrospective cohort (Group 2) evinced reduced time to outcome (treatment duration), making patients ready to discharge. Other fi ndings like the occurrence of PDPH commonly in the younger population (median age in years of Group 1 is 32.5, and Group 2 is 35) and its association with large-bore needles (78% with 25 G Quincke-type and 22% with 27 G Whitacre-type) are consistent with available literature of PDPH [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The prevalence of PDPH among the included studies varied from 1.16% [ 19 ] to 48.8 [ 17 ]. Regarding study design, three studies [ 15 , 19 , 20 ] employed a cross-sectional design; four cohort studies [ [16] , [17] , [18] , 27 ] and two RCT studies [ 21 , 22 ]. Furthermore, concerning the study population, 7 studies [ [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] ] were conducted only on parturients [ [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , 20 , 21 , 27 , 34 ] whereas the remaining two were done on all patients from whose we extracted data of cesarean section [ 19 , 22 ] ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the most common complications from an LP include post-LP headache (10%–40%), back pain (up to 16%), and least commonly, infections and spinal hematoma formation (<0.01%) [1] . Uncommon cases of retroperitoneal abscess formation from dural laceration in patients with meningitis have been reported [ 1 , 2 ]. Although rare, retroperitoneal hemorrhage from arterial injury is a known complication after certain procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention and nerve blocks [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] however, only a few cases have been reported after an LP [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-LP headache and local discomfort are common but generally well tolerated complications [1] . Uncommon and more serious complications are infection, spinal hematoma, retroperitoneal abscess formation, intracranial and intraspinal hemorrhage, and brain herniation [2] , [3] , [4] . Although retroperitoneal hemorrhage from a punctured artery is a known complication after percutaneous coronary intervention or spinal anesthesia, the incidence of retroperitoneal hemorrhage after an LP is low with only a few case reports in current literature [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%