2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2014.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and risk factors of major toxicity associated to first-line antituberculosis drugs for latent and active tuberculosis during a period of 10 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In one small study, DM was associated with 2.5‐ and 3.9‐fold adverse drug effects, respectively, in intensive and continuation treatment phase in crude univariate analysis but the differences failed to reach statistical significance . DM was also associated with more adverse drug effects in univariate analysis in another two studies . Among the study that also attempted to adjust for gender, age and year of diagnosis, no significant independent effect was found but the best estimate of the effect size was 1.33, rather similar to the best estimate of 1.38 in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In one small study, DM was associated with 2.5‐ and 3.9‐fold adverse drug effects, respectively, in intensive and continuation treatment phase in crude univariate analysis but the differences failed to reach statistical significance . DM was also associated with more adverse drug effects in univariate analysis in another two studies . Among the study that also attempted to adjust for gender, age and year of diagnosis, no significant independent effect was found but the best estimate of the effect size was 1.33, rather similar to the best estimate of 1.38 in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The amount of free fraction of ATT crossing the blood ocular barriers and reaching various ocular structures is not clearly known, but from the therapeutic outcome and various ocular toxicities exerted by these drugs indicate that they reach the eye to some extent. 15 In addition, the role of ATT in cases where pathogenesis is considered purely immunogenic remains controversial. It is the ophthalmologist’s responsibility to monitor drug regimens to avoid ocular toxicity without compromising the ocular therapeutic effect of systemic TB therapeutics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB) and pyrazinamide (PZA) for the initial 2‐month phase followed by INH and RIF for 4‐7 months is standard treatment for people at low risk for drug‐resistant disease . Long‐term anti‐TB combination regimens could lead to various types and levels of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which could subsequently lead to discontinued or interrupted treatment, extended treatment time and increased risks of drug resistance, treatment failure and relapse . Anti‐TB drug‐induced liver injury (ATLI) is a serious ADR.…”
Section: What Is Known and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%