2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and Risk Factors for Facet Joint Violation in Open Versus Minimally Invasive Procedures During Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients with Trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of facet violation was reported at 8% to 47% when using pedicle screws. [17][18][19] In addition, a broad range of soft tissue dissection is necessary when inserting screws. Capsular disruption in addition to ligamentous and muscular disruption in PSF could increase susceptibility to PJK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of facet violation was reported at 8% to 47% when using pedicle screws. [17][18][19] In addition, a broad range of soft tissue dissection is necessary when inserting screws. Capsular disruption in addition to ligamentous and muscular disruption in PSF could increase susceptibility to PJK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, open surgery provides more three-dimensional and intuitive visualization, which helps to determine the screw entry point. In recent years, percutaneous screw placement has been reported to have a higher risk of superior segment facet joint injury than traditional open screw placement [3,4]. A finite element analysis by Kim et al suggested that the degree of screw invasion into the intervertebral joints is associated with increased stress of the facet joints and increased pressure of the adjacent discs [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If combined with MIS-TLIF, the fixation technique can further reduce iatrogenic injury of the lumbar and back muscles. However, studies have shown that invasion of the superior segment facet joint is more common in percutaneous screw placement than in open surgery [3,4]. Biomechanical tests, finite element analysis, and clinical studies have shown that screw invasion of the upper facet joints can change the stress distribution of the facet joints to result in the spontaneous fusion of the facet joints and the occurrence of spondylolisthesis in the adjacent disc(s) and increase the likelihood of revision surgery in the future [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the articular surface of the facet joint also shifted to the lateral and coronal planes, blocking the insertion trajectory and ultimately increasing proximal FJV. [22,31] Moreover, patients with facet angle ≥45° were 1.89 times more likely have a proximal FJV than patients with facet angle 45°. When the facet angle increases, the surface of facet joint gradually deviates to the coronal position, thereby blocking the trajectory of screws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%