2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and relationship of an additional root in the mandibular first permanent molar and primary molars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

13
55
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
55
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies found right-side predominance (9,18,20). In contrast, some investigators reported predilections for the left side (19,21); the current study supported the predilection for the left side.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies found right-side predominance (9,18,20). In contrast, some investigators reported predilections for the left side (19,21); the current study supported the predilection for the left side.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Some studies suggested sex-related differences (17,20). However, our current study supported that the prevalence of the distolingual root according to sex showed no statistical significance, which was similar to the Taiwanese population (9,18).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies found right-side predominance (1,3,(15)(16)(17). To the contrary, some investigators reported predilections for the left side (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of a supernumerary root in mandibular primary first molars is estimated at 5% in Taiwanese [2] and 9% in Chinese [3] populations, whereas the occurrence of bilateral mandibular three-rooted primary teeth is only 1% [2]. According to Song et al [4], the probability of the tooth posterior to a mandibular primary first molar with three roots is greater than 94.3%, but in our cases the primary mandibular second molars had two roots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%