Abstract:The Swedish population-based acute myeloid leukemia registry contains data from 3251 patients (excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia) diagnosed between 1997 and 2006. Informative cytogenetic data from 1893 patients were retrospectively added, including 1054 patients aged between 60 and 79 years. Clonal abnormalities were found in 57% of the informative karyotypes. Karyotypic patterns differed by age: t(8;21), inv(16) and t(11q23) were more common in younger patients, whereas loss of 5q, 7q and 17p, monosomal … Show more
“…We observed a similar number of cases of AML inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16; 16)(p13.1;q22) and AML t(8; 21)(q22;q22) (388 and 495 cases, respectively, among 16,328). These results are consistent with those of other groups who studied predominantly white populations in Sweden and Australia [24-26]. In contrast, studies of Asian populations found 3–7 times more cases of AML t(8; 21)(q22;q22) than of AML inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16; 16)(p13.1;q22) [25-27].…”
Background/Aim: As the knowledgebase of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has grown, classification systems have moved to incorporate these new findings. Methods: We assessed 32,941 patients with AML whose records are contained in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: Half of all patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2013 did not have a World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Acute promyelocytic leukemia and acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis were associated with the longest leukemia-specific survival (110 and 115 months, respectively), and AML with minimal differentiation and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with the shortest (30 and 28 months, respectively). For patients in the WHO groups AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS) and AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (AML-RGA), the risk of death was greater for older patients and less for married patients. Black patients with any type of AML-NOS also had a higher risk of death. Patients whose case of AML did not receive a WHO classification were older and this group had a higher risk of death when compared to patients with a WHO type of AML-NOS. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the divergent outcomes of patients with AML and the importance of using the WHO classification system and demographic factors to gauge their prognosis.
“…We observed a similar number of cases of AML inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16; 16)(p13.1;q22) and AML t(8; 21)(q22;q22) (388 and 495 cases, respectively, among 16,328). These results are consistent with those of other groups who studied predominantly white populations in Sweden and Australia [24-26]. In contrast, studies of Asian populations found 3–7 times more cases of AML t(8; 21)(q22;q22) than of AML inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16; 16)(p13.1;q22) [25-27].…”
Background/Aim: As the knowledgebase of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has grown, classification systems have moved to incorporate these new findings. Methods: We assessed 32,941 patients with AML whose records are contained in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: Half of all patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2013 did not have a World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Acute promyelocytic leukemia and acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis were associated with the longest leukemia-specific survival (110 and 115 months, respectively), and AML with minimal differentiation and acute megakaryoblastic leukemia with the shortest (30 and 28 months, respectively). For patients in the WHO groups AML not otherwise specified (AML-NOS) and AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities (AML-RGA), the risk of death was greater for older patients and less for married patients. Black patients with any type of AML-NOS also had a higher risk of death. Patients whose case of AML did not receive a WHO classification were older and this group had a higher risk of death when compared to patients with a WHO type of AML-NOS. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the divergent outcomes of patients with AML and the importance of using the WHO classification system and demographic factors to gauge their prognosis.
“…These results demonstrate that the MK is a major independent very poor prognosis factor in elderly AML. During the past few years, several large studies have been conducted to analyze the prognostic impact of the MK on the outcome of AML (summarized in Table 1), confirming the previously reported findings 1,5,9–13,17–24. Moreover, a recent report demonstrated that the combination of CK (defined in this study as unrelated chromosomal abnormalities ≥4) and the MK missed the least number of patients with unfavorable prognosis 18…”
In 2008, the concept of the monosomal karyotype (MK) in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients was introduced, defined by the presence of a chromosomal aberration pattern characterized by the presence of at least two autosomal monosomies or of one monosomy plus one or more structural aberrations (not including loss of a chromosome). We present a systematic review of the literature about the influence of the MK on the outcome of patients affected by myeloid malignancies (AML, myelodysplastic syndromes, and primary myelofibrosis). For this review, a comprehensive literature search using the term “monosomal karyotype” was performed, considering articles listed in MEDLINE. This analysis of the literature confirms the negative prognostic impact on survival of the MK in myeloid neoplasias. The detrimental effect of MK on AML patients’ outcome is independent of other variables, including adverse cytogenetic features, supporting the identification of this entity as a challenging subgroup of patients with distinct biologic and clinical features.
“…In the present study, the median age of adult AML was lower (38 years) in comparison to Western population (40 -45 years) and other Asian population [6] [8] [9] [31]- [34] [41]. In adult AML, the incidence of t(8;21) was higher (15%) than that of Western population (6% -8%) and comparable to that in Chinese (8% -15%) and Japanese (16%) populations [3] [46].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.