AimsThe aims of this thesis were to establish to what extent adult cancer patients receiving curative-intent chemotherapy potentially compromise their treatment and/or safety by using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and to identify which cancer patients use CAM at this time, why they use it, and who are most at risk.Additionally, it aimed to establish whether there was a need for an educational intervention to guide cancer patients on the safe use of CAM with chemotherapy, develop and publish the educational intervention and to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention through surveying cancer patients and cancer care professionals, particularly doctors.
MethodsThe thesis employed mixed methods, over several phases: a literature review, an observational study of 75 solid tumour patients receiving curative-intent chemotherapy for the first time and then, using results obtained as a framework, an educational brochure intervention was developed. Qualitative methods were used to evaluate the potential acceptance and content of the educational brochure and also to determine the effectiveness of the brochure post publication and intervention.
ResultsPatients receiving chemotherapy may be consuming CAM to treat cancer, to lessen chemotherapy side effects, for symptom management, or to treat conditions unrelated to their cancer. Others may influence cancer patients in their CAM decision-making: practitioners, family, friends, spouse and even casual acquaintances met in waiting rooms and support groups. Cancer patients do not necessarily volunteer their CAM consumption unless asked and prefer their cancer doctor to initiate discussions regarding CAM use. Cancer doctors are reluctant to initiate CAM discussions with their patients.CAM that is systemically absorbed and biologically active is the most likely to interfere with concurrent chemotherapy and potentially cause harm to cancer patients.The curative-intent patient population are most at risk through taking biologically-3 active CAM adjuvant with chemotherapy, by altering chemotherapy dose intensity, which may adversely affect disease-free and overall survival. Mind-body CAM, which has no biological activity, has shown efficacy above standard care when used for support by patients receiving chemotherapy and, when applied using reasonable patient specific precautions, is safe to use with adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.The curative-intent cancer patient study found 60% of the 75 participants were using CAM at the start of chemotherapy treatment. Biologically-active CAM assessed as having potential to interact with prescribed chemotherapy through diminishing dose intensity was ingested by 27% of patients, all of whom had routinely used CAM prior to cancer diagnosis. This was found to be statistically significant (β= +3.13, P = 0.003). CAM was used by 51% of patients for supportive care reasons and by 28% of patients with the intention of treating their cancer. Thirteen percent of patients were told by a CAM advice-giver not to have chemother...