2006
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and Predictors of Difficult and Impossible Mask Ventilation

Abstract: The authors observed the incidence of grade 3 MV to be 1.4%, similar to studies with the same definition of difficult MV. Presence of a beard is the only easily modifiable independent risk factor for difficult MV. The mandibular protrusion test may be an essential element of the airway examination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
373
6
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 557 publications
(407 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
373
6
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the need for awake intubation had been diminished by more frequent use of VL, it is also conceivable that such a decrease could have been masked by a concomitant rise in awake intubation for an increasing population of obese patients 10 in whom a higher incidence of anticipated difficult airway management might be expected. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] While the overall incidence of awake tracheal intubation was 1.06% of GETA cases, there was substantial variability in the rate (0-3.4 per 100 GETA cases) at which individual attending staff performed the procedure. These results were not controlled for subspecialty practice (e.g., anesthesiologists performing mainly regional vs neuroanesthesia), although anecdotally, the four individuals with the two lowest and the two highest rates of awake intubation had similar practice profiles (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the need for awake intubation had been diminished by more frequent use of VL, it is also conceivable that such a decrease could have been masked by a concomitant rise in awake intubation for an increasing population of obese patients 10 in whom a higher incidence of anticipated difficult airway management might be expected. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] While the overall incidence of awake tracheal intubation was 1.06% of GETA cases, there was substantial variability in the rate (0-3.4 per 100 GETA cases) at which individual attending staff performed the procedure. These results were not controlled for subspecialty practice (e.g., anesthesiologists performing mainly regional vs neuroanesthesia), although anecdotally, the four individuals with the two lowest and the two highest rates of awake intubation had similar practice profiles (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 A review of 22,660 mask ventilation attempts identified BMI [ 30 kgÁm -2 to be an independent predictor of difficult mask ventilation and an independent predictor of difficult or impossible mask ventilation and difficult tracheal intubation. 11 Nevertheless, a further study of over 50,000 anesthetics failed to show obesity as an independent predictor of impossible mask ventilation. 12 In this study, 12 radiotherapy to the neck, male sex, presence of a beard, and Mallampati scores 3 or 4 were identified as independent predictors of impossible mask ventilation.…”
Section: Mask Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If the results of several authors with large groups of patients are summarized irrespective of the various divergent definitions, the incidence of difficult mask ventilation in an unselected group of elective patients is 2 % [6][7][8]. The incidence of impossible mask ventilation is 0.15 % (1:670) [6].…”
Section: Incidence Of Difficult Mask Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unexpected "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" situation is to be expected with a probability between 0.008 % (1:13,000) and 0.004 % (1:25,000) [6,8].…”
Section: Incidence Of Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation