“…Figure 7. Forest plot of remdesivir-induced bradycardia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [23,26,27]. Regarding the assessment of sex (OR = 0.998, 95% CI = 0.811-1.228, p = 0.982, I 2 = 38.04%, Egger's p = 0.380), age (OR = 0.286, 95% CI = −0.154-0.725, p = 0.202, I 2 = 94.16%, Egger's p = 0.157), CVDs (OR = 0.977, 95% CI = 0.751-1.271, p = 0.861, I 2 = 30.66%, Egger's p = 0.932), hypertension (OR = 1.253, 95% CI = 0.935-1.679, p = 0.131, I 2 = 32.29%, Egger's p = 0.133), diabetes (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.770-1.118, p = 0.430, I 2 = 0.0%, Egger's p = 0.555), thyroid disease (OR = 1.344, 95% CI = 0.984-1.835, p = 0.063, I 2 = 0.0%, Egger's p = 0.474), ICU admission (OR = 1.080, 95% CI = 0.612-1.905, p = 0.791, I 2 = 83.66%, Egger's p = 0.429), and beta-blocker (OR = 1.038, 95% CI = 0.779-1.382, p = 0.801, I 2 = 0.0%, Egger's p = 0.973) or antiarrhythmic drug usage (OR = 0.814, 95% CI = 0.125-5.288, p = 0.829, I 2 = 70.68%, Egger's p = 0.573), all results indicated no significant difference between the remdesivir-induced bradycardia and bradycardia-free groups (Figures S2-S10).…”