2012
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.6084-12.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and management of late postsurgical seizures in clinical practice.

Abstract: AIm: Seizures are a frequent complication in patients who undergo neurosurgery, and can complicate the post-operative course and deteriorate patients' quality of life. Evidence on the prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy after craniotomy is still lacking. mATeRIAL and meTHods:We undertook an observational longitudinal study following neurosurgical supratentorial interventions, to evaluate seizures onset or persistence, and differences in effectiveness between conventional and newer AEDs. ResuLTs:A total of 100 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an early onset has been explained by taking into account possible pathogenic mechanisms, hyponatremia, brain manipulation, or immediate surgical complications which would account for early postoperative epileptogenic damage. The prevalence of immediate/early seizures (73.4%) over late seizures (26.6%) in our study, compared with similar series where this relationship is inverse [ 16 , 35 ], can be explained once again by the adopted exclusion criteria, favoring the detection of purely “surgery-induced” seizures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Such an early onset has been explained by taking into account possible pathogenic mechanisms, hyponatremia, brain manipulation, or immediate surgical complications which would account for early postoperative epileptogenic damage. The prevalence of immediate/early seizures (73.4%) over late seizures (26.6%) in our study, compared with similar series where this relationship is inverse [ 16 , 35 ], can be explained once again by the adopted exclusion criteria, favoring the detection of purely “surgery-induced” seizures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Of the 32 full‐text articles excluded, four concerned patients under LEV, in which it was impossible to retrieve data regarding safety and efficacy , three concerned patients under LEV who underwent craniotomy, but data regarding the perioperative period were not described , four were excluded because patients receiving LEV did not undergo craniotomy , one study was excluded because patients did not received LEV , one was excluded because patients received a combination of LEV with PHT and one study was excluded because the authors enrolled patients under the age of 18 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, late seizures present beyond the first week after surgical intervention and constitute actual epilepsy . The development of postoperative epilepsy, after supratentorial craniotomy for brain tumour biopsy of excision, has an adverse impact on postoperative clinical course and neurological outcome, cost of hospitalization, and rehabilitation . Thus, the control of perioperative seizures is of utmost importance for outcome optimization in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 Although some studies have focused on the acute phase after surgery, 2,3,9,11,12,19,[22][23][24]28,29,31,35,[37][38][39]50 they did not use cEEG monitoring, similar to others in which postneurosurgical seizures were studied in the subacute to chronic postoperative period. 1,4,5,15,20,25,30,33,41,52 cEEG is particularly vital in patients who undergo anesthetic or sedative treatment that can mask the neurological examination findings, 22 and make abnormal, nonseizure-related rhythmic movements difficult to differentiate from clinical seizures. Although some studies evaluating seizures in neurosurgical patients did use cEEG, 7,10,18,26,40,45,46,48 they were narrow in their focus, did not differentiate the acute time period, included a small cohort, or omitted significant details regarding the type of surgery or underlying neuropathology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%