1988
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198809000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and Etiology of Failed Spinal Anesthetics in a University Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
2
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
40
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, all the spinal inductions at L2-L3 were successful, while a failure rate of 14.2% and 10.5% was observed with use of L3-L4 and L4-L5, respectively. This is consistent with the study by Munhall et al, 21 where 0.0% failure rate was noted when L2-L3 was used compared with a failure rate of 7.3% at L4-L5. Patients who achieved a block height of T8-T10 had 100% failure rate, while 33.3% and 1.3% failure rates were seen at block heights T6-T7 and T4-T5 respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, all the spinal inductions at L2-L3 were successful, while a failure rate of 14.2% and 10.5% was observed with use of L3-L4 and L4-L5, respectively. This is consistent with the study by Munhall et al, 21 where 0.0% failure rate was noted when L2-L3 was used compared with a failure rate of 7.3% at L4-L5. Patients who achieved a block height of T8-T10 had 100% failure rate, while 33.3% and 1.3% failure rates were seen at block heights T6-T7 and T4-T5 respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There are mixed reports in the literature concerning the association of free flow of CSF and FSA. Munhall et al 21 reported a lack of correlation between the free flow of CSF and FSA while Levy et al 22 reported a significantly higher failure rate among patients who had a dry tap of CSF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 This may be due in part to the fact that the vast majority of anesthesiologists master the conventional surface landmark-based techniques for spinal anesthesia with success rates approaching 96%. 3 In addition, there is less familiarity and greater perceived difficulty of spinal sonoanatomy compared with sonoanatomy for other blocks. 4,5 Recently, a novel SonixGPS TM electromagnetic needle tracking system (Ultrasonix, Richmond, BC, Canada) that provides a real-time display of current and projected needle tip positions has been approved by Health Canada for US-guided needle interventions.…”
Section: Résumé Objectif Le Sonixgpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most anesthesiologists believe that the incidence of spinal anesthesia failure is extremely low, but this varies widely among studies and has been reported to be as high as 17% [5]. However, with careful attention, anesthesiologists can avoid expectable failure and drop, lowering the incidence of spinal anesthe- sia failure to about 4% [6]. There are several causes of the failure: unsuccessful lumbar punctures, solution injection errors, inadequate intrathecal spreads, ineffective drug actions, and inadequate management [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%