2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2009.02131.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentives to Innovate in Oligopolies

Abstract: In the spirit of Arrow (The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1962), we examine, in an oligopoly model with horizontally differentiated products, how much a firm is willing to pay for a process innovation that it would be the only one to use. We show that different measures of competition (number of firms, degree of product differentiation, Cournot vs. Bertrand) affect incentives to innovate in non-monotonic, different and potentially opposite ways.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of these works analyzes the role of horizontal product differentiation in the context of policy reform, an aspect which I analyze in this paper. Belleflamme and Vergari (2011) explore the role of product differentiation on the incentive effects of environmental R&D, but put aside the analysis of policy reform of taxes and subsidies on R&D. Gautier (2013) and Lahiri and Symeonidis (2007) examine policy reform in the presence of product differentiation, but the strategic choice of R&D is not present in either analysis. The present analysis derives similar conditions and extends their work by incorporating additional policies in the context of policy reform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these works analyzes the role of horizontal product differentiation in the context of policy reform, an aspect which I analyze in this paper. Belleflamme and Vergari (2011) explore the role of product differentiation on the incentive effects of environmental R&D, but put aside the analysis of policy reform of taxes and subsidies on R&D. Gautier (2013) and Lahiri and Symeonidis (2007) examine policy reform in the presence of product differentiation, but the strategic choice of R&D is not present in either analysis. The present analysis derives similar conditions and extends their work by incorporating additional policies in the context of policy reform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bekkers, R., G. Duysters and B. Verspagen [7] focused on intellectual property rights & its influence on competition. Belleflamme, Paul and Cecilia Vergari [8] provided analysis of oligolistic markets. What is problematic from a legal standpoint is the introduction of the dynamic dimension of innovation in the analysis, that is, of innovation-related arguments that are yet to materialized when administrative action takes place.…”
Section: Investigations On Alibaba and Amazonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin and Saggi (2002) show the effects of competition on product and process R&D. Under nondrastic innovation and considering the degree of product differentiation, the number of firms and the different types of product market competition (i.e. Cournot and Bertrand competition) as three different measures of the strength of competition, Belleflamme and Vergari (2010) show a nonmonotonic relationship between competition and innovation. However, none of these papers considers the effects of competition on welfare, which is our major focus.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%