2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentives to improve the service level in a random yield supply chain: The role of bonus contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al. (2013), Yin and Ma (2015), and Pal and Sana (2018), and studies referenced therein, explore supply chain coordination issues under the random yields environment. Recent research on random yield in a multi‐period setting focuses on information learning (see, e.g., Tomlin, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al. (2013), Yin and Ma (2015), and Pal and Sana (2018), and studies referenced therein, explore supply chain coordination issues under the random yields environment. Recent research on random yield in a multi‐period setting focuses on information learning (see, e.g., Tomlin, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case studies also help to generalize, as the results of the findings using various cases can facilitate some form of replication (Noor, 2008). Besides, conducting other case studies can also diminish the errors and bias of a study through case study procedures and a case database development (Yin andMa, 2015 in Takahashi andAraujo, 2019).…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operational performance of the ACTGSC were defined in terms of customer value and business performance (Wieland and Wallenburg, 2012). Product availability, quality consistency, on-time delivery and order fulfilment correctness were identified as the key indicators of customer value as they were highly valued by customers (Gaudenzi and Borghesi, 2006;Yin and Ma, 2015). The four indicators were also validated by data mining 709 consumer comments on buying Australian table grapes from two popular Chinese online sellers.…”
Section: Modelling Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upstream firm's "supply discontinuity" does not have a significant influence on the downstream firm's "customer value risk" but does result in increased "profit slippage" for the downstream firm. As such, Australian table grape suppliers should make efforts to ensure supply continuity which would keep customers satisfied (Yin and Ma, 2015). As natural disaster is the root cause of supply discontinuity, Australian suppliers should operate geographically diversified farms or work with third-party growers to mitigate natural disasters.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%