2016
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1129613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incarcerated Violent Offenders' Ability to Avoid Revealing Their Potential for Violence on the Rorschach and the MMPI–2

Abstract: Recently, Hartmann and Hartmann (2014) found that psychiatric outpatients, both with and without access to Internet-based information about the Rorschach Inkblot Method (RIM; Weiner, 2003 ) and the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989 ), were unable to imitate healthy test performance on these tests. We replicated the study by administering the RIM and the MMPI-2 to 63 incarcerated violent offenders using similar testing conditions. As in the previous study, comparisons were made not o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Um dos testes utilizados para a avaliação da personalidade, considerado favorável para o uso privativo do psicólogo, no Brasil, em processos de avaliação psicológica, é o teste de Rorschach. Desde a publicação desse teste, o instrumento tem sido aperfeiçoado, mesmo mantendo em seu eixo estruturante os fundamentos norteadores de seu criador (Exner Jr, & Sendín, 1999;Meyer, Viglione, Mihura, Erard, & Erdberg, 2017 O teste de Rorschach é um dos instrumentos que tem se destacado por ser eficaz no estudo de avaliação da personalidade e na identificação de psicopatologias (Nørbech, Fodstad, Kuisma, Lunde, & Hartmann, 2016;Nørbech, Grønnerød, & Hartmann, 2016 (Gacono, Kivisto, Smith, & Cunliffe, 2016;Meyer et al, 2017;Nørbech, Fodstad, et al, 2016;Weiner & Greene, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Um dos testes utilizados para a avaliação da personalidade, considerado favorável para o uso privativo do psicólogo, no Brasil, em processos de avaliação psicológica, é o teste de Rorschach. Desde a publicação desse teste, o instrumento tem sido aperfeiçoado, mesmo mantendo em seu eixo estruturante os fundamentos norteadores de seu criador (Exner Jr, & Sendín, 1999;Meyer, Viglione, Mihura, Erard, & Erdberg, 2017 O teste de Rorschach é um dos instrumentos que tem se destacado por ser eficaz no estudo de avaliação da personalidade e na identificação de psicopatologias (Nørbech, Fodstad, Kuisma, Lunde, & Hartmann, 2016;Nørbech, Grønnerød, & Hartmann, 2016 (Gacono, Kivisto, Smith, & Cunliffe, 2016;Meyer et al, 2017;Nørbech, Fodstad, et al, 2016;Weiner & Greene, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Both Norwegian-language studies investigated symptom minimization using the L and K scales in a simulation design. These studies typically generated small to moderate effect sizes, with the exception of one effect size for the L scale (of eight generated), which had a very large effect when differentiating prison inmates instructed to minimize psychopathology from community members responding honestly ( d = 1.74; Nørbech et al, 2016). Consistent with research on the English-language MMPI-2 (Aparcero et al, 2021), the scales in both studies were less effective when the minimizing group was coached on the nature of the test and its detection strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, before analyzing the R-PAS results, we looked at the possibility of positive simulation by Ann and negative stimulation by Ben. Research has specified that it is difficult for patients with mental problems to portray a healthy performance on the RIM, especially in relation to concealing perceptual and cognitive disturbance (Hartmann & Hartmann, 2014;Nørbech, Fodstad, Kuisma, Lunde, & Hartmann, 2016). Even so, positive simulation causes constricted protocols with a higher than average score on Pure Form (F%) and a lower than average use of CritCont%, Aggressive Content (AGC), and Aggressive Movement (AGM) (Ganellen, 2008;Hartmann & Hartmann, 2014;Nørbech et al, 2016).…”
Section: Test Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%