The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
Conservation Genetics 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8510-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inbreeding: One word, several meanings, much confusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably a common genetic scenario in populations for which a program for the preservation of their genetic variability is being designed and should be taken into account to carefully conserve the genetic background of the founder individuals. In the wild, Tempelton and Read (1994) reported similar behaviour than that we found in the Xalda sheep. For these authors this can be expected in finite populations with separate sexes because of random differences in allele frequency between sexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is probably a common genetic scenario in populations for which a program for the preservation of their genetic variability is being designed and should be taken into account to carefully conserve the genetic background of the founder individuals. In the wild, Tempelton and Read (1994) reported similar behaviour than that we found in the Xalda sheep. For these authors this can be expected in finite populations with separate sexes because of random differences in allele frequency between sexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We estimated the retained genetic diversity (GD) as GD~1{average MK ð Þ Thus, the current population has retained 95.8% of the genetic diversity of the population from which it was derived (i.e., the population 2 horse-generations ago). The loss of 4.2% of diversity over this time equates to an eigenvalue effective population size (Templeton and Read 1994) of 23, or approximately 16% of the census number. We estimated the future loss of genetic diversity using…”
Section: Analyses Using the Pedigreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concern of the low allele variation is that it if continues diminishing, eventually over generations the levels of homozygosity and inbreeding will gradually increase [10,13,50] by the fact that the current population has a small population size, a situation that could increase the extinction risk in M. albiflora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these taxa, the lowest population genetic diversity levels are expected [9][10][11], and many study cases confirm such predictions (e.g., Table 5 [12], Table 1 [6]). These low levels of genetic diversity are explained by the effects of genetic drift, which bring out a severe loss of allele number in small populations [10,13]. Eventually, these extant alleles will have a common ancestor causing high levels of inbreeding and homozygosity [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation