Inbreeding depression and genetic variability in agricultural traits and resistance to phytopathogens in exotic maize populations

Abstract

The effect known as depression by inbreeding refers to the reduction on the average value of quantitative traits, related to plant reproduction and physiology, due to the homozygosis of deleterious alleles. This study evaluated the inbreeding depression and the genetic variability of agricultural traits and of the resistance to phytopathogens in inbred families of two exotic maize populations. The experiments were done in the experimental area of the Universidade Federal de Goiás, Regional Jataí, in the second harvest 2015. Fifty and 40 FS1 of NAP5 and NAP7 populations, respectively, were evaluated interplanting one row with a mixture of base population at every ten plots to estimate depression by inbreeding of the traits evaluated. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with three replications. The following traits were evaluated: AP – plant height (cm), AE – ear height (cm), FM – male flowering (days), PQ – number of broken plants, AC – number of lodged plants, PG – kernel production (kg plot-1). The greatest estimates of depression by inbreeding in the agricultural traits were observed for kernel production, with values of 51.2 and 38.9% for the populations NAP5 and NAP7, respectively. Among the traits of resistance to phytopathogens, the greatest estimate was observed for the stunting complex, with values of -58.9% in NAP5 and -74.2% in NAP7. Both populations under study presented genetic potential to be used in breeding programs with recurrent selection and, after some selection cycles, lineages with good agricultural standard and resistance to phytopathogens can be obtained.

Mean components for choosing maize populations to extract inbred lines

“…The inbreeding depression (ID%) for the grain yield trait was, on an average, 30.89%, and it ranged from 17.42 to 46.09% for the hybrids AG1051 and RK3014, respectively (Table 7). Other results corroborate with the values obtained in this work (Oliveira et al, 2020;Somera et al, 2018).…”

“…When considering the contribution of the estimates for plant height, it is observed on an average, as a higher contribution of m+a (80.43%) in relation to d (19.57%) (Table 8). Similar results were reported by several authors demonstrating that this characteristic has a greater influence of additive effects than others (Oliveira et al, 2020;Somera et al, 2018;Viana et al, 2009).…”