2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4798558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InAs/In0.83Al0.17As quantum wells on GaAs substrate with type-I emission at 2.9 μm

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inInP-based InAs/InGaAs quantum wells with type-I emission beyond 3 μm Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 081914 (2011); 10.1063/1.3629999 Improving the surface morphology of InSb quantum-well structures on GaAs substrates Nondestructive assessment of In 0.48 ( Ga 1−x Al x ) 0.52 P films grown on GaAs (001) by low pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the larger broadening along the Q x direction for sample A than for sample B, as shown in Table 1, implies a worse crystalline quality and larger density of misfit dislocations in sample A. On the other hand, the roughly equal broadening of intensity contours along the Q y direction is small for both samples A and B, which implies that the fluctuations of lattice parameter are similar on both GaAs and InP substrates, as has been reported in another work of our group [17]. Meanwhile, the broadening along the Q x direction is larger than that along the Q y direction for both samples, so the mismatch dislocations are the primary cause for lattice imperfection, whereas the rough interfaces and composition fluctuations are minor causes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore the larger broadening along the Q x direction for sample A than for sample B, as shown in Table 1, implies a worse crystalline quality and larger density of misfit dislocations in sample A. On the other hand, the roughly equal broadening of intensity contours along the Q y direction is small for both samples A and B, which implies that the fluctuations of lattice parameter are similar on both GaAs and InP substrates, as has been reported in another work of our group [17]. Meanwhile, the broadening along the Q x direction is larger than that along the Q y direction for both samples, so the mismatch dislocations are the primary cause for lattice imperfection, whereas the rough interfaces and composition fluctuations are minor causes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The lattice mismatch between In 0.83 Ga 0. 17 As layer and substrate is increased from þ2.1% on InP to þ5.9% on GaAs substrate. Therefore, more research is needed on both material growth and device processing to adopt GaAs substrate for InGaAs PDs and arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In x Ga 1− x As alloy with indium (In) content higher than 0.53 is of great interest in involving near infrared optoelectronic devices due to its convenient band gap tailoring in the range of 0.36–0.74 eV, such as wavelength‐extended ( λ > 1.7 µm) photodetectors (PDs) , quantum well lasers . In x Ga 1− x As (0.53 < x < 1) is also widely applied in high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using 15 nm InAs QWs on continuously-graded metamorphic In x Al 1-x As buffers, RT PL of QWs at 3.05 µm [42] and low temperature lasing of laser diodes at 2.7 µm have been achieved [43]. This scheme can even be explored to mid-infrared metamorphic InAs QWs on GaAs substrate, which is even more attractive than on InP substrate [44]. Optoelectronics -Materials and Devices Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(b), respectively.…”
Section: Development Of Semiconductor Lasers In the 2-3 µM Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%