2010
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inappropriate utilization of intravenous proton pump inhibitors in hospital practice--a prospective study of the extent of the problem and predictive factors

Abstract: This study suggests that the majority of IV PPI prescriptions in hospital are inappropriate, particularly when initiated for non-UGI bleeding indications. Improving prescribing awareness through education of junior medical staff on non-medical wards could reduce inappropriate IV PPI use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
6
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
39
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although one criterion was used to assess the appropriateness of the route of administration during the pre-restriction period, the dramatic decrease in the number of IV vials dispensed during post-restriction period justified the pharmacist initial concern on the large consumption of esomeprazole IV vials. Inappropriate use of IV PPIs can lead to increased cost burden and potential adverse effects, while oral forms has been associated with several advantages over the IV route including lower cost, less utilization of hospital resources, similar clinical outcomes for most indications and less IV related complications [2,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although one criterion was used to assess the appropriateness of the route of administration during the pre-restriction period, the dramatic decrease in the number of IV vials dispensed during post-restriction period justified the pharmacist initial concern on the large consumption of esomeprazole IV vials. Inappropriate use of IV PPIs can lead to increased cost burden and potential adverse effects, while oral forms has been associated with several advantages over the IV route including lower cost, less utilization of hospital resources, similar clinical outcomes for most indications and less IV related complications [2,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate use of IV PPIs can lead to increased cost burden, drug shortages, and potential adverse effects. [2]. Esomeprazole intravenously remains an alternative to oral esomeprazole with similar tolerability and healing rates when used for short-term period in patients with erosive esophagitis who cannot tolerate oral medications [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these new recommendations, a dramatic increase in both oral and intravenous PPI use has been observed across the globe over recent years (Gingold et al, 2004; Hoover, Schumaker & Franklin, 2009; Slattery et al, 2007). However, several studies have demonstrated that 25–75% of patients receiving PPIs, particularly intravenous preparations, had no appropriate indication (Craig et al, 2010; Hoover, Schumaker & Franklin, 2009; Slattery et al, 2007). This emerging trend is worrisome as it reflects high rates of inappropriate prescribing of PPIs in hospitals, leading to drug waste which could have otherwise been prevented (Forgacs & Loganayagam, 2008; Nasser, Nassif & Dimassi, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several audits on the appropriateness of intravenous PPIs have been conducted in the United States (Hoover, Schumaker & Franklin, 2009; MacLaren et al, 2006), Canada (Afif et al, 2007), Europe (Craig et al, 2010; Slattery et al, 2007) and the Middle East (Alsultan et al, 2010). Some studies were retrospective (Afif et al, 2007; Chavez-Tapia et al, 2008; MacLaren et al, 2006; Naunton, Peterson & Bleasel, 2000), whilst others were prospective (Alsultan et al, 2010; Sebastian et al, 2003; Slattery et al, 2007) in study design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Tabela 3 mostra uma comparação entre os IBPs e os ARH2s. O uso de IBPs para profilaxia de sangramento GI relacionado ao estresse em pacientes de terapia intensive têm sido criticado em geral pela disseminação de sua prática e em especial pelo prolongamento de sua prescrição após encerrada a fase de maior risco 6,10,15,17 . Pelo exposto, o uso judicioso dessa poderosa ferramenta em pacientes selecionados parece estar indicado.…”
Section: Ibp (Inibidores Da Bomba De Prótons)unclassified