2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40780-020-0157-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosing in atrial fibrillation patients is associated with prescriptions for outpatients rather than inpatients: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Background: Inappropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been associated with clinical safety and efficacy; however, little is known about clinical data associated with an inappropriate DOAC dosing in Japan. In addition, there is no report in which the appropriateness of DOAC dosing between prescription for inpatients and for outpatients was examined. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated in the inappropriate dosing of DOACs in patients with atrial fibri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with a German single-center observation based on 254 acute stroke patients with known AF, reporting an off-label dose in one out of three patients on factor Xa inhibitors. [32] In the Berlin Atrial Fibrillation Registry, under-dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban at stroke onset was associated with old age, which is in line with prospective AF registries like ORBIT AF II, including only a subset of patients with prior (but not acute) ischemic stroke [14][15][16][17]. Compared to on-label dosing, under-dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban was not significantly associated with stroke severity on hospital admission or at hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in line with a German single-center observation based on 254 acute stroke patients with known AF, reporting an off-label dose in one out of three patients on factor Xa inhibitors. [32] In the Berlin Atrial Fibrillation Registry, under-dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban at stroke onset was associated with old age, which is in line with prospective AF registries like ORBIT AF II, including only a subset of patients with prior (but not acute) ischemic stroke [14][15][16][17]. Compared to on-label dosing, under-dosing of apixaban or rivaroxaban was not significantly associated with stroke severity on hospital admission or at hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Treating physicians are advised to prescribe the guideline-recommended in-label NOAC dosage in each patient, taking patients' age (for dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban), renal function (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban) as well as body weight (apixaban and edoxaban) into account [13]. According to prior investigations, up to 50% of all patients prescribed NOACs were inappropriately dosed, the vast majority of patients being under-dosed [14][15][16][17]. This is of clinical relevance, as results from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials as well as several registries showed that off-label NOAC dosing is associated with worse clinical outcome [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, physicians may place more value on the avoidance of bleeding in high‐risk AF patients, especially in those with a high fall and bleeding risk 3,34,35 . Results of previous studies suggest an increased risk of falls and fractures among older adults using opioids 36,37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 257 records from the PubMed database were identified, and 33 full-text studies were reviewed for more details. Among them, 18 studies were excluded because: (1) eight studies (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) did not report the adjusted RRs; (2) five individual studies have overlapping data (16)(17)(18)(19)(20) (3) two studies presented the data of off-label dose (including overdosing and underdosing) vs. on-label dose of NOACs (21,22), and (4) three studies were not observational cohorts (23)(24)(25). No additional studies were found in the screenings of the reference lists of the relevant studies.…”
Section: Study Selection and Patients' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%