The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9121778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inapparent Strengthening Effect of Twin Interface in Cu/Pd Multilayered Films with a Large Lattice Mismatch

Abstract: It has been found that there are two kinds of interfaces in a Cu/Pd multilayered film, namely, cube-on-cube and twin. However, the effects of the interfacial structure and modulation period on the mechanical properties of a Cu/Pd multilayered film remain unclear. In this work, molecular dynamics simulations of Cu/Pd multilayered film with different interfaces and modulation periods under in-plane tension are performed to investigate the effects of the interfacial structure and modulation period. The interface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…μ = cos φ cos λ , where φ and λ are the Angle between the tensile direction and the normal direction of the slip plane and the Angle between the tensile direction and the slip direction, respectively. Moreover, when the tension is along x , the σ m and corresponding strain ε m of SC COC is slightly higher than that of the SC Twin, which is consistent with the work by Weng et al [ 25 ]. However, when the tension is along y , the σ m and ε m of SC COC are slightly lower than that of SC Twin.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…μ = cos φ cos λ , where φ and λ are the Angle between the tensile direction and the normal direction of the slip plane and the Angle between the tensile direction and the slip direction, respectively. Moreover, when the tension is along x , the σ m and corresponding strain ε m of SC COC is slightly higher than that of the SC Twin, which is consistent with the work by Weng et al [ 25 ]. However, when the tension is along y , the σ m and ε m of SC COC are slightly lower than that of SC Twin.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Unlike the tiny difference in E , σ m and ε m , the difference between the σ f for the different interfacial structures is significant. When the tension is along x , the σ f of SC COC is larger than that of SC Twin, showing the strengthening effect of the COC interface is more obvious than that of the Twin interface, which is consistent with the work by Weng et al [ 25 ]. However, when the tension is along y , the σ f of SC Twin is 15.55% larger than that of SC COC, showing an obvious strengthening of the twin interface, which accords with the traditional cognition of strengthening effect of twin boundary.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Zhang et al systematically investigated the thermal shock behavior of diboride-based UHTCs with additions such as carbon black, an SiC whisker, and disilicide (TaSi 2 ) [25][26][27][28]. Furthermore, the TSR of composites with additions of graphite, SiC fibers, SiC nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and carbon fiber were also extensively investigated [7,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%