2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00178-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of p16INK4a expression in malignant mesothelioma by methylation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…25 This and other studies have shown that, at least in a small percentage of pleural mesotheliomas (11-21%), the CDKN2A gene is inactivated by methylation. [24][25][26] Although we did not test for aberrant methylation of the CDKN2A gene, a similar percentage of our peritoneal mesothelioma cases (19%) showed loss of p16 expression without loss of the CDKN2A gene.…”
Section: Am Krasinskas Et Almentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 This and other studies have shown that, at least in a small percentage of pleural mesotheliomas (11-21%), the CDKN2A gene is inactivated by methylation. [24][25][26] Although we did not test for aberrant methylation of the CDKN2A gene, a similar percentage of our peritoneal mesothelioma cases (19%) showed loss of p16 expression without loss of the CDKN2A gene.…”
Section: Am Krasinskas Et Almentioning
confidence: 66%
“…23 In pleural mesotheliomas, loss of p16 protein expression is typically associated with CDKN2A deletion, but a subset of cases showed loss of p16 due to inactivation of the gene by methylation. [24][25][26] The correlation between CDKN2A deletion, loss of p16 protein expression and survival has not been made in peritoneal mesotheliomas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesothelioma cells seem to recapitulate the epigenetic features of solid tumors since the presence of high genomic instability and a pattern of transcriptionally repressed tumor-suppressor genes, through DNA hypermethylation, has been demonstrated [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: E-mail Address: Mircofanelli@uniurbit (M Fanelli)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power of DNA methylation as a marker derives not only from its ability to be detected in a wide variety of samples (from fresh specimens to bodily fluids and archival paraffin-embedded specimens) but also from the defined localization of the lesion (in promoter CpG islands of genes), allowing the design of gene-specific, targeted probes [22]. To date, findings regarding the role of DNA methylation in MM are still rather limited [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%