2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivating the infralimbic but not prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex facilitates the extinction of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in Long-Evans rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In an appetitive Pavlovian task, inactivation of the ILA, but not the PL, facilitated extinction (Mendoza, Sanio, and Chaudhri, 2015) and studies of renewal with aversive tasks found differences between the PL and ILA (Knapska and Maren, 2009). Selective manipulations of the PL or ILA during context-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking suggest the PL may be required for retrieval of the learned associations underlying responding, while the ILA is important for contextual information processing (Willcocks and McNally, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an appetitive Pavlovian task, inactivation of the ILA, but not the PL, facilitated extinction (Mendoza, Sanio, and Chaudhri, 2015) and studies of renewal with aversive tasks found differences between the PL and ILA (Knapska and Maren, 2009). Selective manipulations of the PL or ILA during context-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking suggest the PL may be required for retrieval of the learned associations underlying responding, while the ILA is important for contextual information processing (Willcocks and McNally, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or isoflurane (5% induction; 2–3% maintenance) and implanted permanent guide cannulae (23-gauge, Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) unilaterally 1 mm above NAc shell or vmPFC and 1 mm above the vSub in the ipsilateral or contralateral hemisphere. The stereotaxic coordinates (Paxinos and Watson 2008) are based on our and others‘ previous work (Bossert and Stern 2014; Bossert et al 2012; Mendoza et al 2015). The coordinates (nosebar set at -3.3 mm) for the different brain areas were for contralateral vmPFC: AP +3.0 mm, ML ±1.5 mm (10° angle), and DV 4.3 mm; for ipsilateral vmPFC: AP +3.0 mm, ML ±0.6 mm, and DV 4.1 mm; for contralateral NAc shell: AP +1.6 mm, ML ±3.0 mm (20° angle), and DV −6.5 mm, for ipsilateral NAc shell: AP +1.6 mm, ML ±1.6 mm (20° angle), and DV −7.2 mm (note that because of stereotaxic constraints, cannula for ipsilateral NAc shell were inserted at a 20° angle from the contralateral hemisphere through the midline (Bossert et al 2012; Ikemoto et al 2005)); and for vSub: AP −6.0 mm, ML ±5.3 mm (4° angle), and DV −7.5 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the topography of specific subsystems between these three large forebrain regions is unknown. This is especially critical given that the amygdala, mPFC and LHA are complex heterogeneous regions comprised of distinct cell groups that mediate different functions (e.g., Ashwell and Ito 2014; Burgos-Robles et al 2013; Cole et al 2013; Heidbreder and Groenewegen 2003; Knapska et al 2012; Maeng and Shors 2013; Martinez et al 2013; Mendoza et al 2014; Senn et al 2014; Swanson and Petrovich 1998). Prior work, with anterograde or retrograde tracing methods, has identified direct pathways from the amygdala to the mPFC and to the LHA, as well as direct pathways from the mPFC to the LHA (e.g., Hoover and Vertes 2007; Hurley et al 1991; Kita and Oomura 1982; Krettek and Price 1977b, 1978; Ono et al 1985; Sesack et al 1989), including the mid-rostrocaudal (tuberal) LHA region which contains orexigenic neuropeptides (Broberger et al 1998; Hahn 2010; Swanson et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%