2004
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.20028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivating Pit‐1 mutations alter subnuclear dynamics suggesting a protein misfolding and nuclear stress response

Abstract: Pit-1, a POU-class nuclear DNA-binding transcription factor, specifies three of the parenchymal cell types in anterior pituitary ontogeny. Using fluorescent fusions and live cell imaging, we have compared the dynamic behavior of wild-type and inactivating Pit-1 point mutations. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and real-time extraction data indicate that wild-type Pit-1 has a dynamic mobility profile, with t(1/2s) approximately 5-7 s when expressed from low to high amounts, respectively. Bioche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the FRAP analysis showed that the Pit-1 W261C mutation had significantly higher intranuclear mobility than the wild-type protein. This result generally agreed with an earlier study in nonpituitary cells (39), although the mobilities we observed here in pituitary cells were much slower than those reported for the HeLa cells. Since the FRAP results represent the averages of many different interactions, including specific interactions with chromatin and the cooperative associations with protein partners, it seems likely that the slower mobilities observed here could reflect these pituitary-specific interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the FRAP analysis showed that the Pit-1 W261C mutation had significantly higher intranuclear mobility than the wild-type protein. This result generally agreed with an earlier study in nonpituitary cells (39), although the mobilities we observed here in pituitary cells were much slower than those reported for the HeLa cells. Since the FRAP results represent the averages of many different interactions, including specific interactions with chromatin and the cooperative associations with protein partners, it seems likely that the slower mobilities observed here could reflect these pituitary-specific interactions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pituitary GHFT1 cells expressing the different CFP fusion proteins were identified using low-intensity illumination with the 405-nm laser line. Sharp and colleagues (39) showed that the mobility of GFP-Pit-1 in HeLa cells was not significantly different over a broad range of expression levels, but it is recognized that the level of protein expression can influence protein mobilities. We compared the relative expression levels of CFP-Pit-1 to the endogenous Pit-1 in GHFT1 cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is striking that the three homeodomain proteins, Pax6, Pax3 and HoxB7, all have a localization pattern that overlaps with the Hoechst dye. We also found the subnuclear distribution pattern of Pax6 to be very similar to what is reported for other transcription factors like Pax3 [48] and Pit-1 [64].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…They further suggest that this is a general characteristic of diseasecausing missense alleles, something our FRAP results on disease-causing Pax6 mutations support. Several studies of transcription factor mutations show a correlation between increased mobility and decreased DNA-binding affinity [35,64,74]. However, the opposite was found for disease-causing mutations in Pax3 where intact DNA binding correlated with increased nuclear mobility [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Except for this disorder, no natural variants of transcription factors have been shown to be prone to protein aggregation. A substitution mutation in the pituitary transcriptional activator Pit-1 has been found to become mislocalized within the nucleus when overexpressed, possibly because of changes in its structure, although no structural determinations have been performed (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%