The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1017/ics.2022.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-work poverty in Montenegro

Abstract: Montenegro has the highest in-work poverty (IWP) rates among all ex-Yugoslav countries. Although the IWP rate in Montenegro is significantly below the average poverty rate for the entire population, it has increased substantially since 2013. Despite that, IWP is rarely discussed as an important topic in the media or by policymakers, although some policies do target the working population at risk. This article starts with the identification of factors that affect IWP and differences in IWP of specific populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Income tax arrangements exhibit little or no progressivity, with few countries having a tax-free allowance for low-income earners. This has led to high levels of in-work poverty, as is documented for the case of Montenegro by Golubović, Mirković, and Kaludjerović (2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Income tax arrangements exhibit little or no progressivity, with few countries having a tax-free allowance for low-income earners. This has led to high levels of in-work poverty, as is documented for the case of Montenegro by Golubović, Mirković, and Kaludjerović (2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the Yugoslav successor states, most work-based benefits were lost following privatisation, while other elements of the social protection systems, including social insurance contributions on wages as a basis for financing social protection (pensions and health care in particular) were carried over. This is highlighted in the analysis by Golubović, Mirković, and Kaludjerović (2022) in this thematic section, who identify the continuation of inwork benefits in Slovenia compared to the relative absence of such benefits in Montenegro and Serbia. This reflects, in part, the gradualist approach to privatisation that was adopted in Slovenia compared to the rapid privatisation that took place in the Western Balkans in the 2000s (Bartlett, 2008;Mencinger, 2004;Uvalić, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation