2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2010.5935953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo transcranial cavitation detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
68
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid increase in TNFα and other proinflammatory factors indicates an acute involvement of NVU elements in response to hypoxia or injury (14,48). Previous studies have suggested that the mechanism of action by which pFUS+MB exposure results in BBBD was stable acoustic cavitation forces acting at the level of TJP (i.e., vessel centric) stretching apart endothelial cells (6,20,28,30,41). However, this proposed mechanism does not address how the cavitation forces interact directly with other cells in the NVU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rapid increase in TNFα and other proinflammatory factors indicates an acute involvement of NVU elements in response to hypoxia or injury (14,48). Previous studies have suggested that the mechanism of action by which pFUS+MB exposure results in BBBD was stable acoustic cavitation forces acting at the level of TJP (i.e., vessel centric) stretching apart endothelial cells (6,20,28,30,41). However, this proposed mechanism does not address how the cavitation forces interact directly with other cells in the NVU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI-guided pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) combined with the infusion of contrast agent microbubbles (pFUS+MB) is a noninvasive technique that can cause transient BBBD in targeted brain regions and facilitate the delivery of large molecules into the parenchyma. Contrast-enhanced MR-guided pFUS+MB transiently opens the BBB in the targeted parenchyma without evidence of microhemorrhages (21,28). It has been postulated that the BBBD following pFUS+MB results from a combination of acoustic radiation forces [i.e., soft tissue displacement exerted by ultrasound (US)]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both stable and inertial cavitation have been observed to both mechanically agitate the microvascular wall (8) and cause extravasation of vascular agents (7,21). Previous reports using longer PLs of 10 or 20 ms have analyzed the acoustic emissions radiating from the acoustically driven microbubbles and have indicated that BBB disruption may occur with stable cavitation or nonviolent inertial cavitation (22)(23). However, it is difficult to infer to the type of cavitation activity present in our experiments due to the shorter duration of the PL used and the fact that we are operating at PRPs near the threshold of BBB disruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that a passive cavitation detector (PCD) can be used to transcranially acquire the acoustic emissions stemming from the microbubble [13]. The frequency analysis of the backscattered signal and, more specifically the cavitation dose, has been proven relevant to characterizing the bubble-capillary interaction and potential damage in mice along with complete histological analysis [10,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%