2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo tibiofemoral contact analysis using 3D MRI-based knee models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
144
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). 20,21 The outline of each bone was extracted on the fluoroscopic images, and then the projection of each 3D bone model was matched to the corresponding outline to reproduce the 3D position of the model in space. This technique has an accuracy of <0.1 mm for the measurement of tibiofemoral joint kinematics, 22 0.09 AE 0.16 mm in measuring patellar shift, 0.13 AE 0.328 in patellar rotation, and 0.12 AE 0.218 in patellar tilt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). 20,21 The outline of each bone was extracted on the fluoroscopic images, and then the projection of each 3D bone model was matched to the corresponding outline to reproduce the 3D position of the model in space. This technique has an accuracy of <0.1 mm for the measurement of tibiofemoral joint kinematics, 22 0.09 AE 0.16 mm in measuring patellar shift, 0.13 AE 0.328 in patellar rotation, and 0.12 AE 0.218 in patellar tilt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone surfaces of the femur, tibia, and patella and articular cartilage surfaces were segmented in each image. 20 The patellar tendon insertion sites at the tibial tubercle and the distal patella were also segmented. 18 After MRI, each subject performed single leg knee bend up to maximum flexion in the field of view of two orthogonally positioned fluoroscopes (BV Pulsera; Philips, Bothell, WA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full extension was defined as the position where the subject was standing in an upright, relaxed position. These orthogonal images were used to quantify the in vivo knee position at each of the targeted flexion angles [5,23].…”
Section: Tibia1 Insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtual C-arm therefore allowed the knee model to be viewed from two orthogonal directions corresponding to the views of the fluoroscope during imaging. The model was manipulated in 6" of freedom inside the virtual C-arm, until the projections of the model matched the outline of the two orthogonal knee images [5,23]. When the projections matched the outlines of the images taken during in vivo knee flexion, the model reproduced the kinematics of the knee.…”
Section: Tibia1 Insertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With use of cartilage contact models of the healthy knee, the medial femoral condyle was shown to remain within the central portion of the tibial plateau from 0°to 90°of flexion during weight-bearing flexion. The lateral articular contact point was 4 mm anterior to the centerline of the tibial plateau at 0°, and it consistently moved posteriorly with flexion 38 . Both the medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact points were located on the inner portions of the tibial plateau and femoral condyles (close to the tibial spine), indicating that the tibial spine may play an important role in knee stability 39 .…”
Section: Normal Cartilage Contact Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 89%