2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
119
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Coefficients of variation for the different component variables were previously reported to range from 3.3% (NN_WID) to 9.1% (FNL), respectively [32].…”
Section: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (Dxa) and Hip Structural Anmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coefficients of variation for the different component variables were previously reported to range from 3.3% (NN_WID) to 9.1% (FNL), respectively [32].…”
Section: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (Dxa) and Hip Structural Anmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Offspring Cohort was scanned with the same machine between 1996 and 2001. As described previously [32,33], an interactive computer program (Hip Structure Analysis, HSA) was used to derive a number of structural variables from the femoral DXA scans. The regions assessed were the narrowest width of the femoral neck (NN), which overlaps or is proximal to the standard Lunar femoral neck region; an intertrochanteric (IT) region located along the bisector of the neck-shaft angle (NSA); and the femoral shaft (S) -at distance of 1.5 times the minimum neck width, distal to the intersection of the neck and shaft axes.…”
Section: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (Dxa) and Hip Structural Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HSA technique extends principles first described by Martin and Burr [41] and calculates dimensions of bone cross-sections at specific locations across the proximal femur using bone mass images generated by absorptiometry scanners. The analysis has been described in detail and illustrated in previous publications [21,23,42]. In brief, the HSA program measures bone mineral density and geometry of cross-sections using distributions of mineral mass traversing the bone axis, averaged for precision over five parallel lines (~ 5 mm) across the bone axis.…”
Section: Hip Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there were 14 phenotypes overall. Coefficients of variation for the different geometric measures were previously reported to range from 3.3 (NN_WID) to 9.1% (FNL) [23].…”
Section: Femoral Geometry By Hip Structural Analysis (Hsa)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An interactive computer program, HSA, developed by Beck and colleagues was used to derive a number of structural variables from the femoral DXA scans [22,23]. The following four regions were assessed: the narrowest width of the femoral neck (NN), which overlaps or is proximal to the standard Lunar femoral neck region; an intertrochanteric (IT) region located along the bisector of the neck-shaft angle (NSA); and the femoral shaft (S), distal to the lesser trochanter.…”
Section: Femoral Geometry By Hip Structural Analysis (Hsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%