2000
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.20.23.8709-8719.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Requirement of Activator-Specific Binding Targets of Mediator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
96
3
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(54 reference statements)
10
96
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in some assays direct interactions between Gal4 and Mediator have been detected (Koh et al 1998;Park et al 2000;Jeong et al 2001). Consistent with this possibility, Bryant and Ptashne (2003) reported that Mediator was recruited to the GAL1 promoter in an spt20⌬ mutant, prompting the suggestion that in the initial stages of activation, SAGA and Mediator are independently contacted and recruited by Gal4.…”
Section: An Ordered Protein-protein Interaction Pathway For Transcripsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in some assays direct interactions between Gal4 and Mediator have been detected (Koh et al 1998;Park et al 2000;Jeong et al 2001). Consistent with this possibility, Bryant and Ptashne (2003) reported that Mediator was recruited to the GAL1 promoter in an spt20⌬ mutant, prompting the suggestion that in the initial stages of activation, SAGA and Mediator are independently contacted and recruited by Gal4.…”
Section: An Ordered Protein-protein Interaction Pathway For Transcripsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The well-characterized acidic activator Gal4 is responsible for the transcriptional stimulation of GAL genes, such as GAL1, which contain Gal4-binding sites in their promoters (Johnston 1987;Johnston and Carlson 1992;Dudley et al 1999). A variety of transcriptional components have been proposed to be the target of Gal4 including TBP (Melcher and Johnston 1995;Wu et al 1996), TFIIB (Wu et al 1996), Srb4 (Koh et al 1998;Park et al 2000), Gal11 (Jeong et al 2001), the Swi/Snf complex (Neely et al 2002), and the SAGA (Spt/Ada/ Gcn5/acetyltransferase) complex (Bhaumik and Green 2001;Brown et al 2001;Larschan and Winston 2001). These proposals are based on either in vitro protein interaction studies or inferences from various indirect in vivo experiments, and to date there is no definitive evidence that Gal4 directly interacts with any of these putative targets in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations in the tail module components sin4 and pgd1 showed both growth defects and suppression when combined with swi6, but a third tail component, gal11, showed neither. It has been suggested that GAL11 mutants prevent association of other tail module subunits (Lee et al 1999;Park et al 2000). If that were the case, we would expect the gal11 phenotypes to include all the phenotypes associated with loss of Sin4 and Pgd1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of the few examples of the complete elimination of AD function by mutation of a Mediator subunit. Other studies have shown partial loss of AD function for specific activators in yeast (Suzuki et al, 1988;Park et al, 2000), mammalian (Ito et al, 2000) and Drosophila cells as the result of elimination or knockdown of specific Mediator subunits. Significant AD function is retained in these examples, suggesting that alternative activation mechanisms still function in the absence of these Mediator subunits.…”
Section: E1a Conserved Region 3 Activation Of Early Viral Gene Expresmentioning
confidence: 99%