1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(74)80063-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo myocardial excitability studied by simultaneous electrocardiogram and electrogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observations lead us to believe that it is usually not more than 40 ms. Similar values were seen experimentally by Brooks and associates (1955), and Rogel and Hasin (1974). Increased SQ duration indicates an increase in one or more of the aforementioned time factors, and occurs as a result of severe myocardial depression.…”
Section: Significance Of the Sq Duration (Latency)supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our observations lead us to believe that it is usually not more than 40 ms. Similar values were seen experimentally by Brooks and associates (1955), and Rogel and Hasin (1974). Increased SQ duration indicates an increase in one or more of the aforementioned time factors, and occurs as a result of severe myocardial depression.…”
Section: Significance Of the Sq Duration (Latency)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…As early as the second hospital day, at the time of pacemaker insertion, first degree block was noted between the pacemaker and the ventricle, as reflected by a stimulus-QRS interval of 100 ms. The normal value probably does not exceed 40 ms (Brooks et al, 1955;Rogel and Hasin, 1974). The tracings shown in Fig.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 90%
“…We have previously shown that the TL current level is associated with the production of a local, non-propagated response (Rogel & Hasin, 1974). This was demonstrated by means of simultaneous recording of the surface electrocardiogram and the local tissue potential at the site of the stimulating electrode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The lower limit of threshold (TL) is therefore that current level which is just insufficient to depolarize the heart regardless of how long it is applied or whether it follows multiple extrasystoles. With simultaneous recording and stimulating from the same electrode it has been shown that the TL current level always induces a local, nonpropagated response, which increases in magnitude with the rise in current level until general spread is manifested (Rogel & Hasin, 1974). It has also been found that within the range of stimuli between TU and TL capture is inconsistent, suggesting spontaneous variations in threshold (Rogel et al, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%