2011
DOI: 10.3233/bir-2011-0584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo liver tissue mechanical properties by transient elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low contrast or tumours softer than the surrounding background may be a useful indicator of primary hepatic cancer. Interestingly, tan δ values and variability were similar for both malignant and background tissue, similar to those previously reported in healthy animal tissue (Chatelin et al , 2011; Kiss et al , 2004). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low contrast or tumours softer than the surrounding background may be a useful indicator of primary hepatic cancer. Interestingly, tan δ values and variability were similar for both malignant and background tissue, similar to those previously reported in healthy animal tissue (Chatelin et al , 2011; Kiss et al , 2004). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The strain-rate dependent behaviour of bovine liver tissue has been investigated (Pervin et al , 2011; Roan and Vemaganti, 2011). In a porcine model, the effects of perfusion on liver tissue mechanics has been studied (Kerdok et al , 2006), and one dimensional transient elastography stiffness estimates have been compared to dynamic mechanical analysis (Chatelin et al , 2011). Dynamic compression testing has also been used to quantify the viscoelastic properties of normal and ablated canine hepatic tissue (Kiss et al , 2004; Kiss et al , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic elastometry has been used to obtain the elastic properties of porcine liver tissue under HIFU ablation and resulted in 26 % underestimation of the Young's modulus as measured by mechanical testing (Shi et al 1999). More recently, the results of transient elastography in characterizing the porcine liver shear modulus in vivo have been found to be in good agreement with those of dynamic shear testing ex vivo (Chatelin et al 2011). Gao et al have performed shear, compression and tensile mechanical testing on porcine livers ex vivo and used the experimental data to develop energy-based constitutive models of liver tissue (Gao et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Given the metabolic nature of liver tissues, it is expected that the mechanical and structural properties of the samples postmortem not only varied across the tissue samples, but was also different from the liver tissue in vivo . Nevertheless, ex vivo findings on mechanical and structural properties of liver under healthy and pathological conditions have widely been used to better understand the disease mechanisms and in vivo findings (Brunon et al 2010; Gao et al 2010; Klatt et al 2010; Chatelin et al 2011; Huang et al 2011; DeWall et al 2012). The primary objective of this study was to obtain the tissue mechanical property contrast between the lesion and the background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting the effect of vascular pressure might drastically change the values of the estimated parameters. This was shown experimentally, e.g., in [11], where the shear modulus values obtained via elastography ex-vivo were much lower than those found in vivo. These observations demonstrate that the inverse modeling of tissue should be based on effective material models (at the scale of available data) that are able to capture the influence of microscopic vasculature (and related pressures) on the coarse mechanical parameters (Lamé coefficients).…”
Section: Characterization Of Vascularized Tissue Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 73%