2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-014-0578-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo kinematics of a robot-assisted uni- and multi-compartmental knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both designs should allow the ligaments to be restored to normal function [2,32], but the roboticassisted system gives feedback to the surgeon to aid this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both designs should allow the ligaments to be restored to normal function [2,32], but the roboticassisted system gives feedback to the surgeon to aid this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many distinct advantages of UKA compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been reported including lower perioperative morbidity [2,3], lower risk for infection [4], less blood loss [5], accelerated recovery [6,7] and improved range of motion [2,7]. A recent cost-effectiveness study demonstrated that medial UKA is preferable to TKA with decreased lifetime costs and improved quality of life in patients over 65 years of age [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UKA assumes the preservation of both cruciate ligaments whereby, in contrast to TKA, only medial or lateral femur and tibia compartments are replaced. Several in vitro and in vivo studies based on fluoroscopic investigations reported that UKA succeeds at restoring normal joint kinematics during kneeling tasks [1315]. Preservation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), however, seems to be a major reason for the normal movement pattern of the replaced condyles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%