IntroductionChemonucleolysis with chymopapain, which was first clinically used by Smith [12], is an effective treatment for intervertebral disc herniation. However, anaphylactic reactions, in particular, have limited the use of this treatment. To prevent anaphylactic reactions, skin testing and the use of H1 and H2 blocking agents have been recommended. Anaphylactic reactions to chymopapain have decreased in frequency over the years [5]. However, the risk of anaphylaxis still remains. Accordingly, an alternative substance for chemonucleolysis has been sought.Proteoglycans are major structural components of the intervertebral disc, and their concentration and organization in the extracellular matrix have a considerable influence on its mechanical properties. Bayliss et al. [2] described a reduction in proteoglycan synthesis rates when disc hydration was decreased.Shioda [11] suggested a mechanism for a decrease in the intradiscal pressure after hypertonic saline injection, by which partial cell necrosis leads to a decrease in matrix production. Released lysosomal enzymes from the cells could then cause partial proteolysis. As a result, the amount of proteoglycan decreases, which means the water-binding capacity decreases. He suggested that the direct effect of hypertonic saline on the matrix was minimal.We have previously reported intradiscal pressure after intradiscal injection of hypertonic saline in rabbits, but the results of the study found that hypertonic saline injected Abstract Chemonucleolysis with chymopapain is an effective alternative to an operation for the treatment of some patients who have a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. However, chymopapain is associated with rare but serious complications. Accordingly, alternative substances for chemonucleolysis have been sought. The main beneficial effect of chemonucleolysis derives from the decrease in the intradiscal pressure. We have previously reported that hypertonic saline injected into the intervertebral discs decreased the intradiscal pressure, but only temporarily. The present experimental study investigated changes in the intradiscal pressure after a repeat intradiscal injection of hypertonic saline. The lumbar intervertebral discs of 18 living rabbits were examined: 10% hypertonic saline was injected intradiscally just once in 12 rabbits, and the same dosage was injected again, 4 weeks later, in the same animals. The intradiscal pressure was measured at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the second injection. The remaining six rabbits were used as controls, without puncture and without injection. The intradiscal pressure of the group with repeat hypertonic saline injection at 4 weeks was significantly lower than that of the control group. The decreased pressure showed a tendency to increase at 8 weeks, and it had recovered at 12 weeks. The results of this study suggest that repeat hypertonic saline injections may be clinically useful.