1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199912010-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure Measurement in Healthy Individuals and in Patients With Ongoing Back Problems

Abstract: The spinal load was highly dependent on the angle of the motion segment in normal discs in vivo. The intradiscal pressure in degenerated discs was significantly reduced compared with that of normal discs. However, further studies on the effect of respiratory movement on intradiscal pressure, the difference between vertical and the horizontal pressures, and the difference in the spinal load between standing and the sitting body positions are necessary. The data obtained from the current study are fundamental to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

36
360
0
16

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(433 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
36
360
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…NZ/wPTs in the compression groups were lower than that in the sham group, while NZ/woPTs in compression groups were greater than that in the sham group studies using the tail model [25], which reported that disc degenerations were induced under continuous compressive stresses of 1 MPa applied for 7-14 days. This magnitude of stress was observed in human lumbar discs in daily activity [32,37,43,44]. Hence, the compressive stress of 0.5 and 1.0 MPa in our experiment was within the physiological level, although the loading period was longer than the physiological one [30].…”
Section: Rationale Of the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…NZ/wPTs in the compression groups were lower than that in the sham group, while NZ/woPTs in compression groups were greater than that in the sham group studies using the tail model [25], which reported that disc degenerations were induced under continuous compressive stresses of 1 MPa applied for 7-14 days. This magnitude of stress was observed in human lumbar discs in daily activity [32,37,43,44]. Hence, the compressive stress of 0.5 and 1.0 MPa in our experiment was within the physiological level, although the loading period was longer than the physiological one [30].…”
Section: Rationale Of the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although the high range of physiological IVD pressure was not expected, the interindividual range of pressure at corresponding levels of the non-treated rabbit spine was far less extensive. Most reported studies on IVD pressure measurements examined one single disc [2,14,15,[20][21][22]30] or the adjacent discs to fusion [4,5,16,25,29]. We conclude that it is important to compare only corresponding levels of the spine with respect to intradiscal pressure measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Sato et al [21] performed disc pressure measurements in subjects with or without ongoing back pain after assessing the degree of disc degeneration by MRI. The intradiscal pressure in subjects with significant disc degeneration was significantly reduced compared with that of healthy discs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several recent papers describing intradiscal pressure measurements reported that good results were obtained using strain-gauge technology [9,13]. The diameter of the needles in the reported studies was 1.2-1.5 mm -too large for using in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%