2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13578-021-00542-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo interactome profiling by enzyme‐catalyzed proximity labeling

Abstract: Enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling (PL) combined with mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a revolutionary approach to reveal the protein-protein interaction networks, dissect complex biological processes, and characterize the subcellular proteome in a more physiological setting than before. The enzymatic tags are being upgraded to improve temporal and spatial resolution and obtain faster catalytic dynamics and higher catalytic efficiency. In vivo application of PL integrated with other state of the art tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity-labeling methods overcome many of these limitations (1, [6][7][8], and have allowed the proteomes of subcellular compartments (1), and weak or transient PPIs to be characterized in vivo (1). Proximity labeling fuses a protein of interest to an enzyme domain that promiscuously tags proteins in its vicinity with a biochemical handle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximity-labeling methods overcome many of these limitations (1, [6][7][8], and have allowed the proteomes of subcellular compartments (1), and weak or transient PPIs to be characterized in vivo (1). Proximity labeling fuses a protein of interest to an enzyme domain that promiscuously tags proteins in its vicinity with a biochemical handle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each method has limitations that can include high false positive rates, poor detection of transient or weak interactors, a low signal-to-noise ratio when detecting PPIs in specific cell types or subcellular compartments, artefacts created during tissue homogenization, and competing requirements for solubilizing proteins while keeping complexes intact ( 1, 2 ). Proximity-labeling methods overcome many of these limitations ( 1, 68 ), and have allowed the proteomes of subcellular compartments ( 1 ), and weak or transient PPIs to be characterized in vivo ( 1 ). Proximity labeling fuses a protein of interest to an enzyme domain that promiscuously tags proteins in its vicinity with a biochemical handle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APEX uses engineered ascorbic acid peroxidase, which, following addition of H 2 O 2 , oxidizes phenol derivatives to biotin-phenoxyl radicals that covalently react with electron-rich amino acids [46]. Important biological information from the use of these methods has been derived, and excellent review articles provide an overview of such achievements [42,43,47,48].…”
Section: Ms-based Methods For Ppi Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%