2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo imaging of tissue eosinophilia and eosinopoietic responses to schistosome worms and eggs

Abstract: Using a sensitive transgenic reporter mouse system and in vivo biophotonic imaging techniques, we present a dynamic analysis of eosinophil responses to schistosome infection. Use of this methodology provided previously unattainable detail on the spatial and temporal distribution of tissue eosinophilia and eosinopoietic responses to schistosome worms and eggs. Dramatic hepatic and intestinal eosinophilia in response to the deposition of schistosome eggs, with accompanying eosinopoiesis in the bone marrow, was o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are reasons to suspect that responses to schistosome worms during prepatent infection are more complex. First, there is evidence of both circulating eosinophilia [26] and increased eosinopoiesis [27] during the first weeks of infection, responses typically mediated by the Th2 cytokine IL-5 [4]. Second, analyses of cutaneous responses to cercariae suggest that invading schistosome larvae stimulate a mixed T helper response in the skin, with evidence of both Th1 and Th2 polarization at the site of infection [28, 29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are reasons to suspect that responses to schistosome worms during prepatent infection are more complex. First, there is evidence of both circulating eosinophilia [26] and increased eosinopoiesis [27] during the first weeks of infection, responses typically mediated by the Th2 cytokine IL-5 [4]. Second, analyses of cutaneous responses to cercariae suggest that invading schistosome larvae stimulate a mixed T helper response in the skin, with evidence of both Th1 and Th2 polarization at the site of infection [28, 29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eosinophils are also considered important against several parasitic infections, particularly against helminths (21,26). In Schistosoma mansoni infection, eosinophils constitute a prominent cell type in granulomas, and there is increased eosinophilopoiesis on infection (27), a process dependent on the interleukin (IL)-5 secreted during Th2 response to eggs (28,29). Mice deficient in IL-5, which have decreased eosinophilopoiesis, present reduced liver granuloma sizes with decreased numbers of eosinophils on S. mansoni infection (30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice deficient in IL-5, which have decreased eosinophilopoiesis, present reduced liver granuloma sizes with decreased numbers of eosinophils on S. mansoni infection (30). In fact, eosinophils have been found to kill the S. mansoni parasite in vitro (26) and to invade dying and sick schistosomes in vivo (29), suggesting that they might be an important defense mechanism against the parasite. However, two mouse lineages deficient in eosinophils were recently studied on S. mansoni infection and found to have no gross alterations in worm burden, granuloma formation, or liver fibrosis (31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adoptive transfer of radioactively labeled eosinophils into helminth-infected rats demonstrated their recruitment to the lung and intestine according to the known migration pattern of the parasites (9). Recently, transgenic mice expressing luciferase in eosinophils were used to demonstrate eosinophil migration in mice during infection with Schistosoma mansoni (10). The strength of this technique is the possibility to perform noninvasive real-time measurements of the kinetics of eosinophil migration in the same animal over a long time period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%