2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.23.7.071207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo imaging in the oral cavity by endoscopic optical coherence tomography

Abstract: The common way to diagnose hard and soft tissue irregularities in the oral cavity is initially the visual inspection by an experienced dentist followed by further medical examinations, such as radiological imaging and/or histopathological investigation. For the diagnosis of oral hard and soft tissues, the detection of early transformations is mostly hampered by poor visual access, low specificity of the diagnosis techniques, and/or limited feasibility of frequent screenings. Therefore, optical noninvasive diag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the measurement points of the buccal side, epithelium was thickest at the central part. The basement membrane was intact in 60.8%, however, an amount of 22.4% was stated as not assessable due to the increased epithelial thickness and the limited imaging depth in biological tissue [ 36 ]. With regard to future studies, automated segmentation of the epithelium of the buccal mucosa could be challenging due to hyperkeratinization and a reduced visibility of the basement membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the measurement points of the buccal side, epithelium was thickest at the central part. The basement membrane was intact in 60.8%, however, an amount of 22.4% was stated as not assessable due to the increased epithelial thickness and the limited imaging depth in biological tissue [ 36 ]. With regard to future studies, automated segmentation of the epithelium of the buccal mucosa could be challenging due to hyperkeratinization and a reduced visibility of the basement membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquisition of OCT image series was realized by the use of a customized optical probe (lateral resolution: 17.4 , working distance: 7.5 mm) based on a commercial rigid endoscope (8711 AGA, Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG, length: 200 mm, insertion diameter: 10 mm, angle of view: 0 ) [ 36 ] in combination with a self-built spectrometer-based OCT system using a fiber-coupled superluminescent diode (SLD-371-HP1, Superlumdiodes Ltd., center wavelength: = 840 nm, FWHM: = 45 nm) and a customized spectrometer [ 37 ], providing an axial resolution in air of 11.6 . Cross-sectional OCT images (64 B-scans) consisting of 480 A-scans were detected with increments of x = 5 (fast scanning axis) and y = 10 (slow scanning axis) to cover a scanning field of 2.4 mm × 0.6 mm in about 2.5 s (f A-scan = 11.88 kHz).…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the hidden crack on a tooth is hardly distinguishable from demineralization based on visual inspection since both appear as whitish spots on the tooth surface. 20 However, these two defects look totally different in OCT images. While demineralization is manifested as strong scattering throughout the affected enamel, 20 the hard-objectinduced inner crack exhibits normal enamel signal with high scattering signal localized to near the crack boundary [ Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(c)]. Vertically extended low scattering regions within the enamel layer above the crevice were shadows caused by high scattering microcracks 20 [white asterisks in Fig. 7(b)].…”
Section: In Vivo Teeth Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral resolution was d x = 50 µm and the axial resolution d z = 20 µm [ 32 ]. Some in vivo applications of OCT followed with special hand-held probes to also image carious or non-carious lesions [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] or soft tissue [ 38 ] and to evaluate composite restorations using a standard device in long-term clinical studies [ 20 , 24 , 25 ]. In particular, the combination of clinical evaluation of composite restorations and the OCT assessment of the tooth-composite bond failure showed that OCT could provide important additional diagnostic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%