2007
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo imaging in experimental preclinical tumor research–A review

Abstract: The multiparametric molecular cell and tissue analysis in vitro and in vivo is characterized by rapid progress in the field of image generation technologies, sensor biotechnology, and computational modeling. Fascinating new potentials in unraveling the detailed functions of single cells, organs, and whole organisms are presently emerging and permit the close monitoring i.e. tumor development or basic cell development processes with an unprecedented multiplicity of promising investigative possibilities. To answ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution may be the incorporation of spectral deconvolution into the methodology described here, leading to improvement of imaging quality through the highly specific discrimination between overlapping fluorescent signals (i.e. real and autofluorescence) (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One solution may be the incorporation of spectral deconvolution into the methodology described here, leading to improvement of imaging quality through the highly specific discrimination between overlapping fluorescent signals (i.e. real and autofluorescence) (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed each of these two strains using three different techniques: PCR, in vivo imaging (9,10) as well as the imaging of explanted organs using the same technique (ex vivo imaging), and flow cytometry (FCM). We compared transgenic strains to each other and to their respective wild-type background.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the last decades saw the development of a vast number of methods for creating 3D information of cell, tissue, and organ morphology, 3D information of gene expression and gene product patterns, or both. Examples for techniques capable of analyzing small specimens, such as tissue samples or embryos are: in vivo microscopy [7][8][9][10], microcomputed tomography ( CT) [11][12][13], micro-magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) [9,[14][15][16][17][18], ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) [19][20][21], optical projection tomography (OPT) [22,23], confocal microscopy [24][25][26][27][28], atomic force microscopy [29][30][31], 3D electron tomography [32,33], histological or macroscopic section based 3D reconstruction methods [34][35][36][37][38], and 3D episcopic imaging methods (see below). This paper does not compare all the different methods for volume data generation and gene expression analysis.…”
Section: In Situ Gene Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are either optimised for diagnosing pathologies in humans (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET)), for in vivo analysis of -often transparent -model animals [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], or for post-mortem analyses of entire biological specimens and biological tissue samples, on the molecular, subcellular, cellular, tissue, and organ system level (atomic force microscopy, electron microscopy, confocal imaging, optical projection tomography (OPT), episcopic imaging techniques, histological sectioning, micro-MRI, micro-CT, near infrared imaging techniques, polarised light spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT)). Not all of these techniques permit 3D imaging of the developing cardiovascular system of unborn mice.…”
Section: Modern 3d Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%