2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo hydrogen peroxide diffusivity in brain tissue supports volume signaling activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H 2 O 2 could be detoxified by the activity of CAT, GPX, APX, and GR, as well as by the ascorbate–glutathione cycle. Molecular hydrogen peroxide is relatively stable, and its reaction with most biological molecules is limited (Ledo et al 2022 ). H 2 O 2 is electrically neutral ROS, but it is detrimental because it can cross cell membranes and reach cell parts far from the site of its formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H 2 O 2 could be detoxified by the activity of CAT, GPX, APX, and GR, as well as by the ascorbate–glutathione cycle. Molecular hydrogen peroxide is relatively stable, and its reaction with most biological molecules is limited (Ledo et al 2022 ). H 2 O 2 is electrically neutral ROS, but it is detrimental because it can cross cell membranes and reach cell parts far from the site of its formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we show that a rapid systemic ROS signal can be triggered by a local treatment of high light (HL) stress in Pinus sylvestris (Pine, a Gymnosperm), Azolla filiculoides (Azolla, a fern), and Selaginella moellendorffii (Selaginella, a Lycopodiaceae; Figure 1). The average rate of the ROS signal measured in these organisms is 0.14 cm min −1 (Table S1), faster than the diffusion rate of H2O2 in water or biological systems (the diffusion coefficient of H2O2 in water or tissues is in the range of 1-2.5 10 −5 cm 2 min −1 ) [34][35][36] , supporting the active nature of this systemic ROS signal. The findings presented in Figure 1 suggest that rapid systemic ROS signaling is conserved across several different members of the vascular plant family and may have evolved before these lineages diverged from a common ancestor.…”
Section: Ros As Rapid Systemic Signals In Vascular Plantsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…A similar directional spread of the ROS signal was also observed in isolated hearts (Figure 8; Movie S2), further supporting the notion that it is not a simple diffusion process. In addition, the rate of the ROS signal observed in hearts was also faster than that of H2O2 in biological systems or water (Table S1) [34][35][36] . Taken together, these findings suggest that the ROS signal observed in a monolayer of H9c2 cells (Figure 7), or isolated hearts (Figure 8), is driven by an active process of ROS production (that could be inhibited by DPI; Figures 7 and 8), involving multiple cells along its path (i.e., not only cells at and around the injury site).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During neuroinflammation, myeloid cells are proposed as main agents of oxidative damage induced to ODCs through their release of ROS/RNS (Mishra & Yong, 2016; Murray & Wynn, 2011). These radicals have different half‐lives which directly affect their extracellular distribution in the CNS, with peroxide potentially able to diffuse up to 100 μm in distance from its cellular source (Ledo et al, 2022; Santos et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During EAE, ROS/RNS can be produced by both activated CNS‐resident microglia (Simpson & Oliver, 2020) and blood borne monocyte‐derived macrophages (Locatelli et al, 2018), which respectively proliferate and invade the CNS and together contribute to the formation of myeloid‐cell dominated CNS lesions (Jordão et al, 2019; Saederup et al, 2010). Despite the ability of some ROS to diffuse extracellularly to a relatively long distance from their cellular source (Ledo et al, 2022), the high reactivity of radicals will presumably affect cells near ROS/RNS production to a higher degree. At clinical disease onset in ODC mitoGFP‐Tomato mice, ODC mitochondria accordingly displayed: (I) compromised morphology in close proximity to lesions containing Iba1 + microglia/macrophages, and (II) higher oxidation state close to iNOS + microglia/macrophages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%