2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo genotoxicity study of single-wall carbon nanotubes using comet assay following intratracheal instillation in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, S-SWCNTs induced a more severe pulmonary toxicity despite having a slightly lower iron content than the L-SWCNTs did. In our previous studies, the pulmonary toxicity of short-tube N-SWCNTs, which contained a high amount iron as an impurity (13700 ppm), was studied in rats (Naya et al, 2012;Fujita et al, 2015b). We observed that the pulmonary inflammation induced by N-SWCNTs in the previous studies is not markedly different from that induced by S-SWCNTs in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, S-SWCNTs induced a more severe pulmonary toxicity despite having a slightly lower iron content than the L-SWCNTs did. In our previous studies, the pulmonary toxicity of short-tube N-SWCNTs, which contained a high amount iron as an impurity (13700 ppm), was studied in rats (Naya et al, 2012;Fujita et al, 2015b). We observed that the pulmonary inflammation induced by N-SWCNTs in the previous studies is not markedly different from that induced by S-SWCNTs in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…The N-SWCNTs, whether singly instilled (at 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg) or repeatedly instilled (once a week for 5 weeks at 0.04 or 0.2 mg/kg), induced acute pulmonary inflammation. However, no DNA damage in lung tissues was observed in comet assays at any of the doses studied (Naya et al, 2012). In another study, following a single intratracheal instillation of N-SWCNTs at 0.66 or 1.32 mg/kg, persistent (6 months) pulmonary inflammation was observed at both doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, intratracheal instillation of SWCNTs did not induce DNA damage in a comet assay using lung tissues of rats singly instilled at 0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg or repeatedly (once a week for 5 weeks) at 0.04 or 0.2mg/(kgÁd) (Naya et al, 2012). These negative results were observed even at doses that elicited pulmonary inflammation.…”
Section: Test Substance Findingsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, other researches showed no genotoxic effects of TiO 2 NPs in vivo when intravenously administrated [16,35,36] or inhaled [14,15] for short exposure times. These disparities may be due to differences in the test conditions, such as exposure time, concentrations, animal model, the dispersal of the particles, and the physicochemical characteristics of TiO 2 used by the investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Additionally, if NPs are able to accumulate within a cell but not necessarily gain access to the nucleus, they may still come into direct contact with DNA during mitosis, when the nuclear membrane breaks down, providing an opportunity for DNA aberrations to arise [5]. The genotoxicity of TiO 2 NPs has been intensively studied in vitro [6][7][8][9][10][11] and in vivo [12][13][14][15][16] , but few studies have evaluated the genotoxic potential of TiO 2 NPs exposed by oral administration [17][18][19]. Overall, these studies evaluated short-term and/or high-dose oral exposure of TiO 2 NPs to animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%