2012
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging with Ag2S Quantum Dots in the Second Near‐Infrared Region

Abstract: Hits the dot: Ag(2)S quantum dots (QDs) with bright near-infrared-II fluorescence emission (around 1200 nm) and six-arm branched PEG surface coating were synthesized for in vivo small-animal imaging. The 6PEG-Ag(2)S QDs afforded a tumor uptake of approximately 10 % injected dose/gram, owing to a long circulation half-life of approximately 4 h. Clearance of the injected 6PEG-Ag(2)S QDs occurs mainly through the biliary pathway in mice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
517
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 663 publications
(528 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
517
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo NIR imaging was achieved over a period of 24 h. The fluorescence emission that lies in the first near-infrared window (NIR-I; 650-900 nm) is far superior to visible wavelengths, but a fluorophore that emits within the second nearinfrared window (NIR-II; 1000-1700 nm) exhibits a greater improvement in imaging quality, such as decreased tissue autofluorescence, reduced photon scattering, and low levels of photon absorption. [63][64][65][66] However, NIR-II fluorophores are often constrained by slow metabolism and long retention in the reticuloendothelial system. Hong et al synthesized a soluble NIR-II emitting probe (5) for imaging the mouse lymphatic vasculature and sentinel lymphatic mapping near the tumor.…”
Section: Nir Imaging Fluorophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo NIR imaging was achieved over a period of 24 h. The fluorescence emission that lies in the first near-infrared window (NIR-I; 650-900 nm) is far superior to visible wavelengths, but a fluorophore that emits within the second nearinfrared window (NIR-II; 1000-1700 nm) exhibits a greater improvement in imaging quality, such as decreased tissue autofluorescence, reduced photon scattering, and low levels of photon absorption. [63][64][65][66] However, NIR-II fluorophores are often constrained by slow metabolism and long retention in the reticuloendothelial system. Hong et al synthesized a soluble NIR-II emitting probe (5) for imaging the mouse lymphatic vasculature and sentinel lymphatic mapping near the tumor.…”
Section: Nir Imaging Fluorophoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In particular, the applicability in the second biological window (II-BW) opens up the possibility of not only deep tissue imaging but also of high contrast, autofluorescence free in vivo fluorescence thermal sensing, as it has already been demonstrated in imaging applications. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] As an additional requirement, the multifunctional NPs to be used should operate under infrared radiation single beam excitation at wavelength avoiding any non-selective cellular damage. Recent studies dealing with the heating effects and the light-induced cytotoxicity during in vitro imaging experiments have pointed out 808 nm as an optimal excitation wavelength, since it simultaneously minimizes both the laser-induced thermal loading of the tissue and the intracellular photochemical damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materials : NMP, Na 2 CO 3 , NaH 2 PO 4 , Na 2 HPO 4 , NaCl, KCl, AgNO 3 O were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (China). MitoTracker Red, LysoTracker Green, and rhodamine 6G were purchased from Molecular Probes (Life Technologies, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Thus far, various materials-including organic dyes, fl uorescent proteins and fl uorescent semiconductor nanocrystals-have been such as exerting the fl uorescence effi ciency, increasing water solubility and biocompatibility, increasing surface passivation or modifi cation with macromolecules. [ 9,18 ] In addition, the carbon dots (CDs) prepared by previous methods have seldom been exploited for imaging cancer in vitro and in vivo, especially not for the targeting imaging of glioma due to biological barriers such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%