“…Under conditions used to force homing of PpLSU3 into yeast rDNA (Muscarella & Vogt, 1993;Lin & Vogt, 1998), NaSSU1 failed to home successfully in yeast+ PCR analysis did not detect any intact introns in rDNA+ However, this analysis did provide evidence of rare intron-exon junction fragments, suggesting that homing at least had been initiated+ Either gene conversion then failed to proceed to completion, or after gene conversion was completed at least in some rDNA copies, the introns were deleted or partially deleted because of deleterious effects on cell growth+ The latter possibility is more likely: we showed that when NaSSU1 was artificially built into a plasmid-born rDNA, preribosomal RNA expression from the plasmid was not able to rescue cell growth in the absence of RNA polymerase I transcription of the rDNA copies on chromosome XII (data not shown)+ It is possible that this failure is because of lack of splicing, or inefficient or incorrect splicing+ Alternatively, the intron might affect some other aspect of ribosomal RNA maturation+ The latter possibility is suggested by the observation that the Tetrahymena intron inserted into the ribosomal RNA genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe prevented proper maturation of the 5+8S species, despite the absence of obvious splicing defects (Good et al+, 1994)+ Presumably group I introns in nuclear rDNA have coevolved with rDNA to maximize splicing efficiency and to minimize disruption of other processes in their host organisms+ It seems possible that minor sequence changes might allow them to adapt to new species, but this notion has not been tested experimentally+ To study NaSSU1 splicing, processing, and endonuclease expression in yeast, we developed a strategy that circumvented the lack of homing in this system+ First, the endonuclease was expressed by itself from a plasmid, and among surviving colonies, a mutant yeast strain was identified that tolerates endonuclease activity+ This strain had acquired a single mutation in the endonuclease target site in all the rDNA copies, analogous to the mutations described previously that confer resistance to the I-PpoI endonuclease in yeast (Muscarella & Vogt, 1993;Lin & Vogt, 1998)+ Into this strain a plasmid was introduced that carries NaSSU1 with ;0+3 kb flanking rDNA 59 exon and 39 exon sequences, under control of the GAL1 promoter+ Induction by galactose in this system led to the synthesis of an rRNA from which the intron spliced and further processed itself, in a manner similar to that seen in vitro and also in Naegleria+ Furthermore, intron expression led to endonuclease activity, which could be detected in crude extracts either by a straightforward DNAcleavage assay, or by a more sensitive PCR-based assay for the characteristic 5 nt sticky end produced by cleavage+ An inactivating mutation in the NaGIR1 ribozyme abrogated endonuclease activity+ This result thus supports the hypothesis that the function of NaGIR1 is to generate the mRNA for the Naegleria endonuclease+ NaSSU1 and DiSSU1 are the only known examples of twin-ribozyme group I introns+ Despite differences in organization (Einvik et al+, 1998a), comparison of processing reveals a number of shared features+ First, in both the DiSSU1 and NaSSU1 systems, a GIR1-mediated cleavage is observed in vivo downstream of the ORF+ Second, both DiSSU1 RNA (Vader et al+, 1999) and NaSSU1 RNA form full-length circles in their host organisms+ Circularization, like 39 SS hydrolysis, is usually thought to be a side reaction of...…”