Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2003
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo evidence for the prokaryotic model of extended codon-anticodon interaction in translation initiation

Abstract: contributed equally to this work Initiation codon context is an important determinant of translation initiation rates in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Such sequences include the Shine± Dalgarno ribosome-binding site, as well as other motifs surrounding the initiation codon. One proposed interaction is between the base immediately preceding the initiation codon (±1 position) and the nucleotide 3¢ to the tRNAf Met anticodon, at position 37. Adenine is conserved at position 37, and a uridine at ±1 has been sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In petA, a U to A substitution one nt upstream of the initiation codon had no detectable affect on translation with the canonical AUG (Chen et al, 1995). When combined with the non-canonical AUU initiation codon the same U to A substitution still supported translation, but at a rate that was reduced by about fivefold (Esposito et al, 2003). Based on this, the U to A substitution in C. eugametos one nt upstream of the canonical AUG initiation codon by itself is likely to have little effect on translation in C. reinhardtii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In petA, a U to A substitution one nt upstream of the initiation codon had no detectable affect on translation with the canonical AUG (Chen et al, 1995). When combined with the non-canonical AUU initiation codon the same U to A substitution still supported translation, but at a rate that was reduced by about fivefold (Esposito et al, 2003). Based on this, the U to A substitution in C. eugametos one nt upstream of the canonical AUG initiation codon by itself is likely to have little effect on translation in C. reinhardtii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Substitutions in C. reinhardtii petD and petA translation initiation context sequences can affect translation when combined with non-canonical initiation codons (Chen et al, 1995;Esposito et al, 2003). In petA, a U to A substitution one nt upstream of the initiation codon had no detectable affect on translation with the canonical AUG (Chen et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most plastid proteins are processed at the N-terminus (Giglione & Meinnel, 2001) whereby the life-span of the mature proteins is influenced by the N-terminal amino acid composition (Giglione et al, 2003). In addition, extended base pairing with the fMet-tRNA anticodon affects translation in chloroplasts (Esposito et al, 2003). A plastid mRNA containing U at pos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the initiation codon context has been shown to affect translation in a limited set of mRNAs. In the case of petA mRNA, the underlying mechanism is mediated through an extended codon-anticodon interaction between a relatively conserved adenine at the -1 position in the mRNA and the nucleotide at position 37 on the 3¢ side of the tRNA (Met) anticodon (Esposito et al 2003). Table 1 summarizes the chloroplast mRNAs for which interacting nuclear-encoded factors affecting translation are known, and shows schematically those cis-acting elements within the 5¢ UTR that have been described to be important for translation or mRNA stability.…”
Section: Translation Initiation In the Chloroplast: Specific Regulatimentioning
confidence: 99%