2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.24.10.105001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties by optical coherence elastography at different cross-linking irradiances

Abstract: Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) strengthens the biomechanical properties of damaged corneas. Quantifying the changes of stiffness due to different CXL protocols is difficult, especially in vivo. A noninvasive elastic wave-based optical coherence elastography system was developed to construct in vivo corneal elasticity maps by excitation of air puff. Biomechanical differences were compared for rabbit corneas given three different CXL protocols while keeping the total energy delivered constant. The Young's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, in vivo assessment of corneal biomechanics has been performed using dynamic wave propagation and quasistatic elastography. 18 , 20 , 39 These tools can provide important mechanical information, but often require complex analysis or additional tools to properly calculate elasticity. 40 , 41 Compared to similar methods such as compression-based OCE, the strain we see here is much lower, which is due to the much smaller displacement induced by the ocular pulse as compared to compression by a mechanical actuator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, in vivo assessment of corneal biomechanics has been performed using dynamic wave propagation and quasistatic elastography. 18 , 20 , 39 These tools can provide important mechanical information, but often require complex analysis or additional tools to properly calculate elasticity. 40 , 41 Compared to similar methods such as compression-based OCE, the strain we see here is much lower, which is due to the much smaller displacement induced by the ocular pulse as compared to compression by a mechanical actuator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCE with an external excitation source has been used to assess the mechanical properties of the cornea in vivo using dynamic wave propagation methods as well as quasistatic techniques. 19,21,42 However, these techniques have a variety of limitations in acquisition and analysis, such as patient discomfort, nonlinear mechanical behavior, or lengthy imaging times. Since the technique presented in this work does not require complex wave analysis or additional tools to determine tissue mechanical properties, we can assess the mechanical properties of the cornea using only a phase-sensitive OCT system, a ubiquitous tool in ophthalmology and optometry clinics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical analyses estimated a 0.01 MPa shear modulus for the group of untreated corneas, and up to 0.03 MPa for the groups of treated corneas. In a subsequent work [ 32 ], using in-vivo elastography, the elastic modulus at the physiological IOP was measured as 0.09 MPa for untreated corneas and 0.14 MPa for CXL corneas irradiated at different powers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%