2007
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Electroporation Enhances the Immunogenicity of Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural 3/4A DNA by Increased Local DNA Uptake, Protein Expression, Inflammation, and Infiltration of CD3+ T Cells

Abstract: The mechanisms by which in vivo electroporation (EP) improves the potency of i.m. DNA vaccination were characterized by using the hepatitis C virus nonstructural (NS) 3/4A gene. Following a standard i.m. injection of DNA with or without in vivo EP, plasmid levels peaked immediately at the site of injection and decreased by 4 logs the first week. In vivo EP did not promote plasmid persistence and, depending on the dose, the plasmid was cleared or almost cleared after 60 days. In vivo imaging and immunohistochem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore suggest that electroporationadjuvant strategies may have better efficacy in increasing the expression level of DNA vaccines in human applications, which are consistent with the previous reported results. 44,45 However, the electroporation can also induce cytokine secretion and inflammatory cell infiltration in the muscle hours after the treatment, 46,47 which may also facilitate SAP-mediated clearance and limits the efficacy of DNA vaccines. We therefore suggest that electroporation should be preformed immediately after DNA inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore suggest that electroporationadjuvant strategies may have better efficacy in increasing the expression level of DNA vaccines in human applications, which are consistent with the previous reported results. 44,45 However, the electroporation can also induce cytokine secretion and inflammatory cell infiltration in the muscle hours after the treatment, 46,47 which may also facilitate SAP-mediated clearance and limits the efficacy of DNA vaccines. We therefore suggest that electroporation should be preformed immediately after DNA inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the main reason for this might be resulting from a lack of APCs at the DNA injection site in humans as there are very few professional APCs in muscles after DNA immunization (Barouch et al, 2002). However, EP, the administration of electrical pulses to muscle or dermal tissue following DNA injection, has been shown to enhance the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines in a wide variety of small and large animal models (Buchan et al, 2005;Folgori et al, 2006;Ahlén et al, 2007;Hooper et al, 2007;Luckay et al, 2007;Hirao et al, 2008b;Rosati et al, 2009). EP functions partially by increasing myocyte permeability and thus facilitating plasmid uptake and antigen expression by host cells (Aihara and Miyazaki, 1998;Rizzuto et al, 1999;Widera et al, 2000;Gronevik et al, 2005).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Dna Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought that danger signals caused by EP's needle probes and the electric pulses might be possibly responsible for this immune cell infiltration. These localized effects likely help to insure that the strength and duration of the responses are maintained when the vaccine is tested in larger animals, including rabbits and humans (Ahlén et al, 2007). Thus, it seems likely that EP can induce a more potent immune response through both more uptake of DNA to host cells, leading to more antigen expression, and more recruitment of APCs to the injection site (Fig.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Dna Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 DNA vaccine technology also eliminates the need for biocontainment and the risk of exposure to live viral agents. Several modalities have been employed to deliver DNA vaccines, including intramuscular injection using conventional needle and syringe, 3 electroporation, 14 intradermally by the needle-free biojector 15 and epidermally through a gene gun. 16,17 However, one of the concerns regarding DNA vaccines is their limited potency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%