2007
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200704000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Efficacy of Antimicrobial-Coated Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it should not negatively interfere with the decisive process of osteointegration of the uncemented implants, which determines the long-term survival in arthroplasty. Regarding antimicrobial activity, there have been several studies reporting on different successful antibiotic strategies for implants in general [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Hydroxyapatite (HA) was shown to have a 1742-7061/$ -see front matter Ó 2010 Acta Materialia Inc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it should not negatively interfere with the decisive process of osteointegration of the uncemented implants, which determines the long-term survival in arthroplasty. Regarding antimicrobial activity, there have been several studies reporting on different successful antibiotic strategies for implants in general [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Hydroxyapatite (HA) was shown to have a 1742-7061/$ -see front matter Ó 2010 Acta Materialia Inc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the efficacy of PBM(þMR) paste demonstrated in the present study would not have been observed using other organisms also encountered in clinical practice. However, minocycline and rifampicin alone provide broad-spectrum coverage for implanted devices [20,21,28]. Second, the study was limited to pacemaker pulse generators, which have smaller surface areas relative to other implantable electrical devices, including defibrillators, neural stimulators, and drug infusion systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the need for localized delivery of antibiotics [20,21], the ideal delivery biomaterial for uses as a prophylactic against CEID infection should be: 1) easy to apply at the time of CIED implantation; 2) an enhancer of tissue pocket healing, which could reduce seroma formation and further reduce the likelihood of infection; 3) completely biodegradable so that it would not be a source for further inflammation, biofilm formation, or interfere with subsequent surgical intervention; 4) cost-effective to enable it to become a standard of care; and 5) help mitigate cytotoxicity of delivered drugs. While clinically available products address many of these requirements [6,7,22,23], they do not enhance healing, require additional attention to implant technique, are relatively expensive to manufacture, and do not possess anti-cytotoxic actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this method, systemic side effects are reduced because antibiotics should not reach high serum concentrations. Many materials have been investigated as potential local delivery vehicles (Darouiche, 1999(Darouiche, , 2004Ewald et al, 2006;Darouiche et al, 2007). Polymers such as collagen and chitosan are simply and rapidly loaded by dipping them in a solution of the chosen antibiotic.…”
Section: Local Delivery Of Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%