2023
DOI: 10.3390/cells12060955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Efficacy and Safety Evaluations of Therapeutic Splicing Correction Using U1 snRNA in the Mouse Retina

Abstract: Efficacy and safety considerations constitute essential steps during development of in vivo gene therapies. Herein, we evaluated efficacy and safety of splice factor-based treatments to correct mutation-induced splice defects in an Opa1 mutant mouse line. We applied adeno-associated viruses to the retina. The viruses transduced retinal cells with an engineered U1 snRNA splice factor designed to correct the Opa1 splice defect. We found the treatment to be efficient in increasing wild-type Opa1 transcripts. Corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be worth mentioning that a significant part of the studies relying on the use of both modified U1 snRNAs and ExSpeU1s was developed in the labs of Mirko Pinotti (University of Ferrara, Italy) and of Franco Pagani (Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in Trieste, Italy) [12,13,38,44,48,51,58,59], where the whole pipeline to address their therapeutic potential in vitro and in vivo, seems to be well-implemented. However, it is important to stress that many other teams, in different labs, have been able to replicate the same sort of methods, achieving similar results for other disease-causing mutations [11,16,41,61,66]. This adds up to the overall therapeutic potential of engineered U1s, by demonstrating the replicability of the method and the robust correction levels it may promote.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be worth mentioning that a significant part of the studies relying on the use of both modified U1 snRNAs and ExSpeU1s was developed in the labs of Mirko Pinotti (University of Ferrara, Italy) and of Franco Pagani (Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in Trieste, Italy) [12,13,38,44,48,51,58,59], where the whole pipeline to address their therapeutic potential in vitro and in vivo, seems to be well-implemented. However, it is important to stress that many other teams, in different labs, have been able to replicate the same sort of methods, achieving similar results for other disease-causing mutations [11,16,41,61,66]. This adds up to the overall therapeutic potential of engineered U1s, by demonstrating the replicability of the method and the robust correction levels it may promote.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A similar approach combining the modified U1 snRNAs and U6 snRNAs was also very recently developed by the same group [66] for the correction of the previously referred 5 ss OPA1 mutation, c.1065+5G>A, which underlies a severe ocular disorder. These authors tested this combined therapy in a mouse model carrying the Opa1 c.1065+5G>A 5 ss mutation (Opa1 enu/+ ), which causes the same splicing defect observed in the patient's fibroblasts.…”
Section: When Modified U1 Snrnas Meet Other Therapeutic Molecules: Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%