2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2004.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo effects of propolis, a honeybee product, on gilthead seabream innate immune responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These fibres were found in other fish and mammalians (Acosta et al 2005;Schubert-Schoppmeyer et al 2008) and they were correlated with poor meat quality. Finally, as previously described, the SGR was not significantly affected by the dietary intake of propolis at 10 g propolis·kg -1 diet according to the results of Cuesta et al (2005) and in discordance with Abd-El-Rhman (2009) according to who propolisethanolic -extract and crude propolis evoked the highest specific growth rate.…”
Section: Body Length and Fibre Typesupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fibres were found in other fish and mammalians (Acosta et al 2005;Schubert-Schoppmeyer et al 2008) and they were correlated with poor meat quality. Finally, as previously described, the SGR was not significantly affected by the dietary intake of propolis at 10 g propolis·kg -1 diet according to the results of Cuesta et al (2005) and in discordance with Abd-El-Rhman (2009) according to who propolisethanolic -extract and crude propolis evoked the highest specific growth rate.…”
Section: Body Length and Fibre Typesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Several authors have demonstrated the biological benefits of propolis but it is hard to compare the present findings and the current results with the literature because reports on the addition of propolis to diets deal with its effects on the immune response in fish (Cuesta 2005;Chu 2006). Talas (2009) reported that propolis has protective haematological and biochemical effects on rainbow trout.…”
Section: Body Length and Fibre Typementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Similarly, Cuesta et al (2005) have related increased number of monocyte-macrophages and granulocytes phagocytosis from the blood of Sparus aurata fed supplemented diet with propolis. On the other hand, a gradated increase in leucocyte accumulation on the inflammatory site induced by Escherichia coli injection was reported for tilapia with the highest migration activity 24 hours after injection (Matsuyama and Iida, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This has allowed us to get a lot of information about the regulation of the seabream immune response, and concretely the NCC activity. Thus, we have shown in vitro and/or in vivo modulation of seabream NCC activity by vitamins C (Cuesta et al, 2002b), E , A (Cuesta et al, 2003b) and D3 (Cerezuela et al, 2009), chitin (Cuesta et al, 2003c;Esteban et al, 2000Esteban et al, , 2001, levamisole (Cuesta et al, 2002c), lactoferrin , melatonin (Cuesta et al, 2008a), propolis (Cuesta et al, 2005b), inulin (Cerezuela et al, 2008), unmethylated oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) containing cytosine-phosphodiester-guanosine (CpG) motifs (Cuesta et al, 2008b(Cuesta et al, , 2008c, probiotic bacteria Salinas et al, 2005Salinas et al, , 2006Salinas et al, , 2008, yeast (Cuesta et al, 2007;Ortuño et al, 2002;Reyes-Becerril et al, 2008;Rodríguez et al, 2003), fungi (Rodríguez et al, 2004), virus , environmental contaminants (p,p´-DDE and lindane) (Cuesta et al, 2008d) or stress factors (air exposure, crowding and anaesthetics) (Cuesta et al, 2003d). In general, we have demonstrated great NCC increments after these treatments.…”
Section: Modulation Of the Fish Cytotoxic Activitymentioning
confidence: 86%