2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo dynamic acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with rotator cuff tears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported that AHD had changed in a monomodal or parabolic pattern during arm elevation, 3 , 17 similar to what we observed. Our results show AHD was smaller between 60° and 120° of humeral elevation, corresponding to the painful arc, 15 with the smallest distance of approximately 3 mm regardless of the posture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous studies have reported that AHD had changed in a monomodal or parabolic pattern during arm elevation, 3 , 17 similar to what we observed. Our results show AHD was smaller between 60° and 120° of humeral elevation, corresponding to the painful arc, 15 with the smallest distance of approximately 3 mm regardless of the posture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consequently, numerous studies have compared measures of the subacromial space between asymptomatic controls and participants diagnosed with ''impingement syndrome'' 3---6 or rotator cuff tears. 7,8 However, these studies often report small or no group differences, which has called into question the presumption of subacromial compression as a mechanism for rotator cuff pathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the AHD findings in 59 non-athlete patients revealed a significantly smaller AHD in FG (P < 0.001). A positive relationship was found between a reduced AHD and the severity of STT [21]. Saupe also found a higher prevalence of full-thickness STT in the reduced AHD patient FG Full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear group PG Partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear group p: statistical significance between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%