2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.04.240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo dosimetry in gynecological applications—A feasibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous study images acquired after treatment showed on average ~2% dose reduction at MOSFET position due to the tendency for the posterior row of needles to drop [4]. The correction for MOSFET energy dependent response is assumed to be linear with distance, however a recent study by Van Gellekom et al [14] found that at 5mm distance the MOSFET relative response changes non-linearly which if correct would reduce the predicted readings in our study, however it is very difficult to accurately measure the relative response at small distances due to the dose gradient around the source. A further possible explanation for measuring systematically low is limitation in the accuracy of planning on ultrasound in terms of reconstruction accuracy.…”
Section: Which Needles Are Outside the Error Detection Threshold?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our previous study images acquired after treatment showed on average ~2% dose reduction at MOSFET position due to the tendency for the posterior row of needles to drop [4]. The correction for MOSFET energy dependent response is assumed to be linear with distance, however a recent study by Van Gellekom et al [14] found that at 5mm distance the MOSFET relative response changes non-linearly which if correct would reduce the predicted readings in our study, however it is very difficult to accurately measure the relative response at small distances due to the dose gradient around the source. A further possible explanation for measuring systematically low is limitation in the accuracy of planning on ultrasound in terms of reconstruction accuracy.…”
Section: Which Needles Are Outside the Error Detection Threshold?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Kertzscher et al 117 published a review paper in 2014, covering many aspects of the use of IVD in brachytherapy. Recently, a feasibility study for IVD in gynecological applications has been published by Van Gellekom et al 118 . They evaluate differences between measured and predicted doses to verify the applicator configuration with the Utrecht Interstitial Fletcher applicators.…”
Section: Recent and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the problems associated with internal in vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy, which is characterised by a high dose gradient, is the size of the detector. It must be: (1) of small size to minimise the effects of dose averaging detection on a volume as much as possible, and (2) compatible with the thin interstitial catheters of the most common brachytherapy applications including prostate [ 8 , 9 ], vaginal-cuff brachytherapy (VCBT), and other gynaecological sites such as cervical cancer [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The use of different in vivo dosimetry systems such as inorganic scintillator detectors, plastic scintillator detectors (PSD), and microMOSFET among others, has been extensively described [ 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%