2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00310-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo deamination of cytosine-containing cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in E. coli: a feasible part of UV-mutagenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the deamination of cytosine produces a uracil-containing CPD, which frequently induces C-to-T transitions after Pol -dependent error-free synthesis (58), although uracil residues and uracil/guanine mispairs are preferentially removed by the base excision repair and mismatch repair pathways, respectively. The in vivo deamination of cytosines in CPDs takes from several hours to a few days, depending on local sequence context (2,7,33,50,59,62). Taking these results together, it is likely that cytosine residues in dermal CPDs are more likely to be deaminated than those in epidermal CPDs, since these lesions persist longer in the dermis than in the epidermis, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Role For Pol In Prevention Of Uv-induced Mesenchymal Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…That is, the deamination of cytosine produces a uracil-containing CPD, which frequently induces C-to-T transitions after Pol -dependent error-free synthesis (58), although uracil residues and uracil/guanine mispairs are preferentially removed by the base excision repair and mismatch repair pathways, respectively. The in vivo deamination of cytosines in CPDs takes from several hours to a few days, depending on local sequence context (2,7,33,50,59,62). Taking these results together, it is likely that cytosine residues in dermal CPDs are more likely to be deaminated than those in epidermal CPDs, since these lesions persist longer in the dermis than in the epidermis, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Role For Pol In Prevention Of Uv-induced Mesenchymal Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been shown that UVB enhances the formation of CPDs at methylated CpG sites [Drouin and Therrien, 1997], whereas CpG sites become refractory to 64PP formation when methylated [Glickman et al, 1986;Pfeifer et al, 1991]. CPD formation is known to promote deamination of cytosine residues in the dimer [Tessman et al, 1994;Barak et al, 1995;Tu et al, 1998;Burger et al, 2003], converting a cytosine-containing CPD to a uracilor thymine-containing CPD, which could cause C ? T mutations through translesional DNA synthesis (TLS) with DNA polymerase h [Jiang and Taylor, 1993;Johnson Either base adjacent to the 5 0 or 3 0 side of the cytosine that should be subject to mutation to thymine is shown.…”
Section: Uvb-induced Mutation Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because C-containing CPDs must deaminate to become mutagenic by the polymerase pathway, factors that accelerate deamination are also expected to enhance C to T mutation frequency. Although much is known about the deamination of CPDs in vitro and in vivo (2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13), nothing is known about the effect of chromatin structure on their deamination in vivo and how this may relate to UV mutation hot spots and cold spots. Nucleosomes are the main structural component of chromatin and are composed of about 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped 1.65 times around a histone core (14 -16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%